Cited by 46Environmental Justice and Health DisparitiesPublic Health and Environmental IssuesEnvironmental law and policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Community based collaboration for environmental justice: south-east Halifax environmental reawakening

Open access
Wing, Steve, Grant, Gary, Green, Merle, Stewart, Chris·1996·Environment and Urbanization

Abstract

The paper describes environmental racism and its underlying causes and then presents a case study of environmental racism in the United States where a toxic dump and large hog production factories are systematically sited in poorer areas. These are also areas with an above average proportion of African Americans and American Indians. The paper also describes a programme of environmental awakening in one area to fight environmental racism and to support isolated, rural and semi-rural communities in their efforts to recover environmental values. This programme includes community workshops; environmental health consultations; a quantitative analysis of environmental justice; seminars to raise awareness of environmental health; and festivals and other means of promoting greater awareness of the main environmental issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/095624789600800214

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Metadata

Authors
Wing, S., Grant, G., Green, M., & Stewart, C.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Concerned Citizens of Tillery (CCT), PO Box 61, Tillery, North Carolina 27887, USA.
  • Halifax County Health Department, PO Box 10, Dobbs St., Halifax, North Carolina 27839, USA.
  • Columbia Asia (IN)
Venue
Environment and Urbanization
Published
1996-10
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
129-140
ISSN
  • 0956-2478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-0301
OpenAlex
W2006123892
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Environment and Urbanization (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Public Health and Environmental Issues
  • Social Sciences › Law › Environmental law and policy
Keywords
environmental justice, environmental racism, community-based collaboration, hazardous waste sites, pig farming, African Americans, Native Americans, environmental health, rural communities, environmental awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review