Wishful Seeing: More Desired Objects Are Seen as Closer
Abstract
Although people assume that they see the surrounding environment as it truly is, we suggest that perception of the natural environment is dependent upon the internal goal states of perceivers. Five experiments demonstrated that perceivers tend to see desirable objects (i.e., those that can fulfill immediate goals-a water bottle to assuage their thirst, money they can win, a personality test providing favorable feedback) as physically closer to them than less desirable objects. Biased distance perception was revealed through verbal reports and through actions toward the object (e.g., underthrowing a beanbag at a desirable object). We suggest that seeing desirable objects as closer than less desirable objects serves the self-regulatory function of energizing the perceiver to approach objects that fulfill needs and goals.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Use of reference materials causes motivation and expectations that can bias observations and interpretation of the actual evidence.
“Thus, such use of reference materials causes motivation and expectations that then can bias the observations and interpretation of the actual evidence”
From Biased and biasing: the hidden bias cascade and bias snowball effects (2025) · cites this paper as Balcetis & Dunning, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 320
- Authors
- Balcetis, E., & Dunning, D.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Balcetis, Emily
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-17
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-152
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2130565691
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. Public Health Service (R01-56072)
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- self-regulation, approach behavior, need satisfaction
- MeSH terms
- Affect, Distance Perception, Drinking, Goals, Humans, Motivation, Optical Illusions, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perceptual Distortion, Psychomotor Performance, Reward, Social Environment, Students, Thirst, Feedback, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review