Cited by 199Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesEmotions and Moral BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Emotion Differentiation as Resilience Against Excessive Alcohol Use: An Ecological Momentary Assessment in Underage Social Drinkers

Kashdan, Todd B., Ferssizidis, Patty, Collins, R. Lorraine, Muraven, Mark·2010·Psychological Science

Abstract

Some people are adept at using discrete emotion categories (anxious, angry, sad) to capture their felt experience; other people merely communicate how good or bad they feel. We theorized that people who are better at describing their emotions might be less likely to self-medicate with alcohol. During a 3-week period, 106 underage social drinkers used handheld computers to self-monitor alcohol intake. From participants' reported experiences during random prompts, we created an individual difference measure of emotion differentiation. Results from a 30-day timeline follow-back revealed that people with intense negative emotions consumed less alcohol if they were better at describing emotions and less reliant on global descriptions. Results from ecological momentary assessment procedures revealed that people with intense negative emotions prior to drinking episodes consumed less alcohol if they were better at describing emotions. These findings provide support for a novel methodology and dimension for understanding the influence of emotions on substance-use patterns.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797610379863

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an EMA study with 106 underage drinkers, high emotion differentiators were less likely to binge drink when experiencing intense negative emotions prior to drinking.

    “The study found a significant moderation effect such that high emotion differentiators were less likely to binge drink when experiencing intense negative emotions prior to drinking.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 199

Authors
Kashdan, T. B., Ferssizidis, P., Collins, R. L., & Muraven, M.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Kashdan, Todd B.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2010-08-09
Volume
21
Issue
9
Pages
1341-1347
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2164082346
Cited by
199
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA07595, R01AA007595, AA12770, R21AA012770)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937, MH-73937)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
emotion differentiation, self-medication, alcohol consumption, negative emotions, emotion description, emotion regulation, adolescent alcohol use, substance use, emotional intensity, individual differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Emotions, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review