Emotion Differentiation as Resilience Against Excessive Alcohol Use: An Ecological Momentary Assessment in Underage Social Drinkers
Abstract
Some people are adept at using discrete emotion categories (anxious, angry, sad) to capture their felt experience; other people merely communicate how good or bad they feel. We theorized that people who are better at describing their emotions might be less likely to self-medicate with alcohol. During a 3-week period, 106 underage social drinkers used handheld computers to self-monitor alcohol intake. From participants' reported experiences during random prompts, we created an individual difference measure of emotion differentiation. Results from a 30-day timeline follow-back revealed that people with intense negative emotions consumed less alcohol if they were better at describing emotions and less reliant on global descriptions. Results from ecological momentary assessment procedures revealed that people with intense negative emotions prior to drinking episodes consumed less alcohol if they were better at describing emotions. These findings provide support for a novel methodology and dimension for understanding the influence of emotions on substance-use patterns.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an EMA study with 106 underage drinkers, high emotion differentiators were less likely to binge drink when experiencing intense negative emotions prior to drinking.
“The study found a significant moderation effect such that high emotion differentiators were less likely to binge drink when experiencing intense negative emotions prior to drinking.”
From Decoupling as a Mechanism of Change in Mindfulness and Acceptance: A Literature Review (2015) · cites this paper as Kashdan et al., 2010
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 199
- Authors
- Kashdan, T. B., Ferssizidis, P., Collins, R. L., & Muraven, M.
- Affiliations
- George Mason University (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- University at Albany, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kashdan, Todd B.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-08-09
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1341-1347
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2164082346
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA07595, R01AA007595, AA12770, R21AA012770)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH073937, MH-73937)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- emotion differentiation, self-medication, alcohol consumption, negative emotions, emotion description, emotion regulation, adolescent alcohol use, substance use, emotional intensity, individual differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Alcohol Drinking, Alcoholism, Emotions, Female, Humans, Individuality, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Resilience, Psychological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review