Recovering From Conflict in Romantic Relationships: A Developmental Perspective
Open accessAbstract
This study adopted a developmental perspective on recovery from conflict in romantic relationships. Participants were 73 young adults (target participants), studied since birth, and their romantic partners. A novel observational coding scheme was used to evaluate each participant’s degree of conflict recovery, operationalized as the extent to which the participant disengaged from conflict during a 4-min “cool-down” task immediately following a 10-min conflict discussion. Conflict recovery was systematically associated with developmental and dyadic processes. Targets who were rated as securely attached more times in infancy recovered from conflict better, as did their romantic partners. Concurrently, having a romantic partner who displayed better recovery predicted more positive relationship emotions and greater relationship satisfaction. Prospectively, target participants’ early attachment security and their partners’ degree of conflict recovery interacted to predict relationship stability 2 years later, such that having a partner who recovered from conflict better buffered targets with insecure histories.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Securely attached individuals experience more satisfactory and successful relationships.
“Securely attached individuals experience more satisfactory and successful relationships.”
From The Predictive Role of Self-Esteem, Attachment Styles, and Family of Origin Functions in Explaining Conflict Resolution in Romantic Relationships (2022) · cites this paper as Salvatore et al., 2011
The Results (Developmental analyses; page not provided) link greater infant attachment security to better conflict recovery by young adults and their partners. The paper does not show that securely attached individuals generally have more satisfying or more stable relationships: satisfaction is examined in relation to partner conflict recovery, and the Results (Relationship stability; page not provided) report no significant stability effect of partner recovery among the more secure participants. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 115
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Berk MS Andersen SM 2000 The impact of past relationships on interpersonal behavior: Behavioral confirmation in the social-cognitive process of transference Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79 546 562 11045738
- Berscheid E Snyder M Omoto AM 1989 The Relationship Closeness Inventory: Assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57 792 807
- Carlson EA Sroufe LA Egeland B 2004 The construction of experience: A longitudinal study of representation and behavior Child Development 75 66 83 15015675
- Gottman J Notarious C Markman H Bank S Yoppi B Rubin ME 1976 Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34 14 23
- Gottman JM Levenson RW 1999 Rebound from marital conflict and divorce prediction Family Process 38 287 292 10526766
- Gross JJ Thompson RA Gross JJ 2007 Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations Handbook of emotion regulation 3 24 New York, NY Guilford Press
- Hayes AF Matthes J 2009 Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations Behavior Research Methods 41 924 936 19587209
- Hendrick SS 1988 A generic measure of relationship satisfaction Journal of Marriage and the Family 50 93 98
- Kenny DA Kashy DA Cook WL 2006 The analysis of dyadic data New York, NY Guilford Press
- Kobak RR Sceery A 1988 Attachment in late adolescence: Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others Child Development 59 135 146 3342708
- Kunce LJ Shaver PR Bartholomew K Perlman D 1994 An attachment-theoretical approach to caregiving in romantic relationships Advances in personal relationships: Vol. 5. Attachment processes in adulthood 205 237 London, England Jessica Kingsley
- Lund M 1985 The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 2 3 23
- Rholes WS Simpson JA Campbell L Grich J 2001 Adult attachment and the transition to parenthood Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 421 435 11554644
- Roisman GI Madsen SD Hennighausen KH Sroufe LA Collins WA 2001 The coherence of dyadic behavior across parent-child and romantic relationships as mediated by the internalized representation of experience Attachment & Human Development 3 156 172 11708735
- Rönkä A Oravala S Pulkkinen L 2002 “I met this wife of mine and things got onto a better track”: Turning points in risk development Journal of Adolescence 25 47 63 12009749
- Schore AN 2005 Back to basics: Attachment, affect regulation, and the developing right brain: Linking developmental neuroscience to pediatrics Pediatrics in Review 26 204 217 15930328
- Simpson JA Collins WA Tran S Haydon KC 2007 Attachment and the experience and expression of emotions in romantic relationships: A developmental perspective Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 355 367 17279854
- Sroufe LA Egeland B Carlson EA Collins WA 2005 The development of the person: The Minnesota Study of Risk and Adaptation From Birth to Adulthood New York, NY Guilford Press
- Thompson R Cassidy J Shaver PR 2008 Early attachment and later development: Familiar questions, new answers Handbook of attachment 2 348 365 New York, NY Guilford Press
- Tran S Simpson JA 2009 Prorelationship maintenance behaviors: The joint roles of attachment and commitment Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 685 698 19785486
- Authors
- Salvatore, J. E., Kuo, S. I.-C., Steele, R. D., Simpson, J. A., & Collins, W. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Institute of Child Development
- Corresponding author
- Salvatore, Jessica E.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01-18
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 376-383
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- PMC
- PMC3060296
- OpenAlex
- W2142418155
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH40864, R01MH040864, T32MH015755)
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD054850)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Forgiveness and Related Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- conflict recovery, romantic relationships, attachment security, early attachment, dyadic processes, relationship stability, relationship satisfaction, young adults, developmental perspective
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Individuality, Infant, Love, Male, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personal Satisfaction, Personality Development, Social Support, Transfer, Psychology, Negotiating, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review