Cited by 416Urban Green Space and HealthPro-Environmental Behavior and AttitudesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Underestimating Nearby Nature: Affective Forecasting Errors Obscure the Happy Path to Sustainability

Nisbet, Elizabeth K., Zelenski, John M.·2011·Psychological Science

Abstract

Modern lifestyles disconnect people from nature, and this may have adverse consequences for the well-being of both humans and the environment. In two experiments, we found that although outdoor walks in nearby nature made participants much happier than indoor walks did, participants made affective forecasting errors, such that they systematically underestimated nature’s hedonic benefit. The pleasant moods experienced on outdoor nature walks facilitated a subjective sense of connection with nature, a construct strongly linked with concern for the environment and environmentally sustainable behavior. To the extent that affective forecasts determine choices, our findings suggest that people fail to maximize their time in nearby nature and thus miss opportunities to increase their happiness and relatedness to nature. Our findings suggest a happy path to sustainability, whereby contact with nature fosters individual happiness and environmentally responsible behavior.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797611418527

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kellert S. R., 1993, The biophilia hypothesis
  2. Nisbet E. K., 2009, Paper presented at the 8th Biennial Conference on Environmental Psychology
  3. Ulrich R. S., 1993, The biophilia hypothesis, 73

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 416

Metadata

Authors
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Nisbet, Elizabeth K.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2011-08-09
Volume
22
Issue
9
Pages
1101-1106
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2153433343
Cited by
413
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Green Space and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
happiness, connection with nature, environmental concern, time use, well-being, human-nature disconnection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Conservation of Natural Resources, Environment, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nature, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review