A Bilingual Advantage in Visual Language Discrimination in Infancy
Abstract
The origins of the bilingual advantage in various cognitive tasks are largely unknown. We tested the hypothesis that bilinguals’ early capacities to track their native languages separately and learn about the properties of each may be at the origin of such differences. Spanish-Catalan bilingual and Spanish or Catalan monolingual infants watched silent video recordings of French-English bilingual speakers and were tested on their ability to discern when the language changed from French to English or vice versa. The infants’ performance was compared with that of previously tested French-English bilingual and English monolingual infants. Although all groups of monolingual infants failed to detect the change between English and French, both groups of bilingual infants succeeded. These findings reveal that bilingual experience can modulate the attentional system even without explicit training or feedback. They provide a basis for explaining the ontogeny of the general cognitive advantages of bilinguals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In monolingual Spanish/Catalan and bilingual Spanish-Catalan infants with no experience with either language, only bilingual infants noticed a change in language in silent videos.
“Again, only the bilingual infants noticed the change in language, even though the children in this study had no experience with either language.”
From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [134]
Bilingualism enhances general perceptual attentiveness through attending to two sets of visual cues.
“The authors concluded that bilingualism enhances general perceptual attentiveness through the experience of attending to two sets of visual cues.”
From Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain (2012) · cites this paper as [134]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/s0163-6383(84)80022-3 · Cited by 2,801 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Roots of Bilingualism in Newborns
Byers-Heinlein, K., Burns, T. C., & Werker, J. F. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797609360758 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bilingualism: consequences for mind and brain
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I. M., & Luk, G. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.03.001 · Cited by 1,386 · see citing works
The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience
Bialystok, E. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000099 · Cited by 906 · see citing works
Critical periods in speech perception: New directions
Werker, J. F., & Hensch, T. K. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015104 · Cited by 774 · see citing works
Self-citationBilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention
Bialystok, E. (2015) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12116 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Growing up multitasking: The costs and benefits for cognitive development
Courage, M. L., Bakhtiar, A., Fitzpatrick, C., Kenny, S., & Brandeau, K. (2015) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2014.12.002 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sebastián-Gallés, N., Albareda-Castellot, B., Weikum, W. M., & Werker, J. F.
- Affiliations
- Center for Brain and Cognition, Department of Technology, Universitat Pompeu Fabra
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Werker, Janet F.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-07-18
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 994-999
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2151758079
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 37.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- bilingual advantage, language discrimination, Catalan-Spanish bilinguals, French-English bilinguals, attentional modulation, bilingual infants
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Child Development, Discrimination, Psychological, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Speech Perception, Multilingualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review