Value-Driven Attentional Capture in Adolescence
Abstract
Adolescence has been characterized as a period of both opportunity and vulnerability. Numerous clinical conditions, including substance-use disorders, often emerge during adolescence. These maladaptive behaviors have been linked to problems with cognitive control, yet few studies have investigated how rewards differentially modulate attentional processes in adolescents versus adults. Here, we trained adults and adolescents on a visual task to establish stimulus-reward associations. Later, we assessed learning in an extinction task in which previously rewarded stimuli periodically appeared as distractors. Both age groups initially demonstrated value-driven attentional capture; however, the effect persisted longer in adolescents than in adults. The results could not be explained by developmental differences in visual working memory. Given the importance of attentional control to daily behaviors and clinical conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, these results reveal that cognitive control failures in adolescence may be linked to a value-based attentional-capture effect.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young individuals are more prone to distraction by previously reward-associated stimuli than older individuals.
“Young individuals are more prone to distraction by previously reward-associated stimuli than older individuals (Roper et al., 2014)”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Roper et al., 2014
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Roper, Z. J. J., Vecera, S. P., & Vaidya, J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-09-10
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1987-1993
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2126275357
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- adolescence, cognitive control, reward, stimulus-reward associations, extinction learning, visual working memory, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, age differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Cues, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Iowa, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review