Cited by 57Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Value-Driven Attentional Capture in Adolescence

Roper, Zachary J. J., Vecera, Shaun P., Vaidya, Jatin G.·2014·Psychological Science

Abstract

Adolescence has been characterized as a period of both opportunity and vulnerability. Numerous clinical conditions, including substance-use disorders, often emerge during adolescence. These maladaptive behaviors have been linked to problems with cognitive control, yet few studies have investigated how rewards differentially modulate attentional processes in adolescents versus adults. Here, we trained adults and adolescents on a visual task to establish stimulus-reward associations. Later, we assessed learning in an extinction task in which previously rewarded stimuli periodically appeared as distractors. Both age groups initially demonstrated value-driven attentional capture; however, the effect persisted longer in adolescents than in adults. The results could not be explained by developmental differences in visual working memory. Given the importance of attentional control to daily behaviors and clinical conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, these results reveal that cognitive control failures in adolescence may be linked to a value-based attentional-capture effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797614545654

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Young individuals are more prone to distraction by previously reward-associated stimuli than older individuals.

    “Young individuals are more prone to distraction by previously reward-associated stimuli than older individuals (Roper et al., 2014)”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Roper et al., 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 57

Authors
Roper, Z. J. J., Vecera, S. P., & Vaidya, J. G.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2014-09-10
Volume
25
Issue
11
Pages
1987-1993
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2126275357
Cited by
57
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
adolescence, cognitive control, reward, stimulus-reward associations, extinction learning, visual working memory, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, age differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Adult, Age Factors, Attention, Cues, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Iowa, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Reward, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review