Cited by 39Aging and Gerontology ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and Disability

Think Fast, Feel Fine, Live Long: A 29-Year Study of Cognition, Health, and Survival in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

Open access
Aichele, Stephen, Rabbitt, Patrick, Ghisletta, Paolo·2016·Psychological Science

Abstract

In a 29-year study of 6,203 individuals ranging in age from 41 to 96 years at initial assessment, we evaluated the relative and combined influence of 65 mortality risk factors, which included sociodemographic variables, lifestyle attributes, medical indices, and multiple cognitive abilities. Reductions in mortality risk were most associated with higher self-rated health, female gender, fewer years as a smoker, and smaller decrements in processing speed with age. Thus, two psychological variables—subjective health status and processing speed—were among the top predictors of survival. We suggest that these psychological attributes, unlike risk factors that are more narrowly defined, reflect (and are influenced by) a broad range of health-related behaviors and characteristics. Information about these attributes can be obtained with relatively little effort or cost and—given the tractability of these measures in different cultural contexts—may prove expedient for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of conditions related to increased mortality risk in diverse human populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797615626906

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 39

Authors
Aichele, S., Rabbitt, P., & Ghisletta, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Aichele, Stephen
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2016-02-25
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
518-529
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2276993316
Cited by
39
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
mortality risk factors, self-rated health, processing speed, cognitive aging, longevity, survival prediction, smoking, gender differences, health behavior, older adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Aptitude, Cognition, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thinking, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review