Think Fast, Feel Fine, Live Long: A 29-Year Study of Cognition, Health, and Survival in Middle-Aged and Older Adults
Open accessAbstract
In a 29-year study of 6,203 individuals ranging in age from 41 to 96 years at initial assessment, we evaluated the relative and combined influence of 65 mortality risk factors, which included sociodemographic variables, lifestyle attributes, medical indices, and multiple cognitive abilities. Reductions in mortality risk were most associated with higher self-rated health, female gender, fewer years as a smoker, and smaller decrements in processing speed with age. Thus, two psychological variables—subjective health status and processing speed—were among the top predictors of survival. We suggest that these psychological attributes, unlike risk factors that are more narrowly defined, reflect (and are influenced by) a broad range of health-related behaviors and characteristics. Information about these attributes can be obtained with relatively little effort or cost and—given the tractability of these measures in different cultural contexts—may prove expedient for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of conditions related to increased mortality risk in diverse human populations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Self-reported happiness is linked to longevity, personality traits and reduced mortality risk.
“while self-reported happiness is linked to longevity [152], personality traits [153] and reduced mortality risk [154].”
From Human-centred artificial intelligence for mobile health sensing: challenges and opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as [154]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Aichele, S., Rabbitt, P., & Ghisletta, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Aichele, Stephen
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-02-25
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 518-529
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2276993316
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
- Keywords
- mortality risk factors, self-rated health, processing speed, cognitive aging, longevity, survival prediction, smoking, gender differences, health behavior, older adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Aptitude, Cognition, Female, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Thinking, Proportional Hazards Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review