The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities
Abstract
The organization of embodied participation frameworks, stance and affect is investigated using as data a sequence in which a father is helping his daughter do homework. Through the way in which they position their bodies toward both each other and the homework sheet that is the focus of their work the two contest the interactive and cognitive organization of the activity they are pursuing together. The father insisted that their work be organized in a way that would allow him to demonstrate the practices required to solve her problems. However the daughter refused to rearrange her body to organize the participation framework that would make this possible, and demanded instead that Father tell her the answers. When the daughter consistently refused to cooperate Father eventually walked out, but returned later, and they constructed a very different affective and cognitive alignment. Such phenomena shed light on range of different kinds of epistemic, moral and affective stances that are central to both the organization of cognition and action, and to how participants constitute themselves as particular kinds of social and moral actors in the midst of the mundane activities that constitute daily family life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
Goodwin, C. (2000) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x · Cited by 3,073
Self-citation
Cited by
Can social interaction constitute social cognition?
De Jaegher, H., Di Paolo, E., & Gallagher, S. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.009 · Cited by 911
Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective
Deppermann, A. (2013) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014 · Cited by 262
Learning to Feel Like a Scientist
JABER, L. Z., & HAMMER, D. (2016) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.21202 · Cited by 225
Siry, C., Ziegler, G., & Max, C. (2012) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20481 · Cited by 99
The influence of parental smartphone use, eye contact and ‘bystander ignorance’ on child development
Raudaskoski, S., Mantere, E., & Valkonen, S. (2017) · Media, Family Interaction and the Digitalization of Childhood · doi:10.4337/9781785366673.00021 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodwin, C.
- Venue
- Discourse & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-73
- ISSN
- 0957-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3624
- OpenAlex
- W2167576251
- Cited by
- 1,034
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 192.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0957926507069457
- The paper
- Goodwin, C. (2007). Participation, stance and affect in the organization of activities. Discourse & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507069457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.