The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Commentary I: ‘It’s a hijra!’ Queer linguistics revisited
Abstract
In a review of contributions to a special issue of Discourse & Society on queer linguistics, this article argues that the concept of indexicality, as theorized across diverse fields in sociocultural linguistics, has the potential to offer a much richer account of subjectivity than found in dominant strands of queer theory. While queer theory valorizes practice over identity, viewing the latter as fixed and necessarily allied with normativity, research on language and social interaction suggests that an analytic distinction between practice and identity is untenable. The indexical processes that work to produce social meaning are multi-layered and always shifting across time and space, even within systems of heteronormativity. It is this semiotic evolution that should become the cornerstone of a (new) queer linguistics.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Indexical relationships between linguistic practice and social identity shift according to context and time; social meaning is not linear but rather 'ubiquitous and exponential'.
“This reflects a key tenet of sociocultural linguistics, whereby the indexical relationships between linguistic practice and social identity shift according to context and time; social meaning is not linear but rather 'ubiquitous and exponential' (Hall, 2013: 638).”
From ‘You're not supposed to be gay, you're black’: Analysing race and LGBTQ+ youth identity through an intersectional lens (2025) · cites this paper as Hall, 2013
Citations
Cites
Identity and interaction: a sociocultural linguistic approach
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605054407 · Cited by 3,797 · cited 1×
“Social meaning is never static in this paradigm, but is instead complexly emergent from the stances and styles habitually taken up in interaction (for reviews, see Bucholtz and Hall, 2004a, 2004b, 2005).”
BackgroundSelf-citationConversationally Implicating Lesbian and Gay Identity
Liang, A. C. (1999) · Reinventing Identities · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126297.003.0016 · Cited by 21
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 · DOI
- Althusser L (1971) Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (trans. Brewster B). New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 127–186.
- Barrett R, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 181, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4159/9780674020870 · DOI
- 10.1215/10642684-2006-032 · DOI
- Boellstorff T, 2013, Paper presented at the 20th American University Conference on Lavender Languages and Linguistics
- Bourdieu P, 1972, Outline of a Theory of Practice
- 10.1017/S0047404599002043 · DOI
- Bucholtz M, 2004, A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 268
- 10.1017/S0047404504334020 · DOI
- Butler J, 1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
- Butler J, 1993, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’
- Cameron D, 1997, Language and Masculinity, 47
- 10.1017/CBO9780511791178 · DOI
- 10.1632/pmla.2006.121.3.819 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822383901-007 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1215/9780822385981 · DOI
- 10.1215/9780822393184 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00296.x · DOI
- Halberstam J, 2008, Graduate Journal of Social Science, 5, 140
- Hall K, 1996, Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 279
- Hall K, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 430, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0026 · DOI
- 10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.184 · DOI
- Hall K, 1996, Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice, 228
- 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00010 · DOI
- 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477 · DOI
- Leap WL, 1996, Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English
- Livia A, 2000, Pronoun Envy, 10.1093/oso/9780195138528.001.0001 · DOI
- Livia A, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 3, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0001 · DOI
- Mendoza-Denton N, 1999, Speaking Chicana: Voice, Power, and Identity, 39
- Pratt ML, 1987, The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, 48
- Queen R, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 233, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0014 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 · DOI
- Warner M, 1999, The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life
- 10.1215/9780822394945 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, L. (2025) · Journal of Sociolinguistics · doi:10.1111/josl.12676 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado, USA
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Kira
- ORCID
- Hall, Kira
- Venue
- Discourse & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 634-642
- ISSN
- 0957-9265 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3624
- OpenAlex
- W2046542088
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Discourse & Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- queer linguistics, indexicality, subjectivity, queer theory, heteronormativity, semiotics, social meaning, hijrah, language and social interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review