Cited by 62Gender Studies in LanguageGender and Feminist StudiesLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Commentary I: ‘It’s a hijra!’ Queer linguistics revisited

Hall, Kira·2013·Discourse & Society

Abstract

In a review of contributions to a special issue of Discourse & Society on queer linguistics, this article argues that the concept of indexicality, as theorized across diverse fields in sociocultural linguistics, has the potential to offer a much richer account of subjectivity than found in dominant strands of queer theory. While queer theory valorizes practice over identity, viewing the latter as fixed and necessarily allied with normativity, research on language and social interaction suggests that an analytic distinction between practice and identity is untenable. The indexical processes that work to produce social meaning are multi-layered and always shifting across time and space, even within systems of heteronormativity. It is this semiotic evolution that should become the cornerstone of a (new) queer linguistics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0957926513490321

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Indexical relationships between linguistic practice and social identity shift according to context and time; social meaning is not linear but rather 'ubiquitous and exponential'.

    “This reflects a key tenet of sociocultural linguistics, whereby the indexical relationships between linguistic practice and social identity shift according to context and time; social meaning is not linear but rather 'ubiquitous and exponential' (Hall, 2013: 638).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0 · DOI
  2. Althusser L (1971) Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays (trans. Brewster B). New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 127–186.
  3. Barrett R, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 181, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0011 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.4159/9780674020870 · DOI
  5. 10.1215/10642684-2006-032 · DOI
  6. Boellstorff T, 2013, Paper presented at the 20th American University Conference on Lavender Languages and Linguistics
  7. Bourdieu P, 1972, Outline of a Theory of Practice
  8. 10.1017/S0047404599002043 · DOI
  9. Bucholtz M, 2004, A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, 268
  10. 10.1017/S0047404504334020 · DOI
  11. Butler J, 1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity
  12. Butler J, 1993, Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’
  13. Cameron D, 1997, Language and Masculinity, 47
  14. 10.1017/CBO9780511791178 · DOI
  15. 10.1632/pmla.2006.121.3.819 · DOI
  16. 10.1215/9780822383901-007 · DOI
  17. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2008.00374.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1215/9780822385981 · DOI
  19. 10.1215/9780822393184 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00296.x · DOI
  21. Halberstam J, 2008, Graduate Journal of Social Science, 5, 140
  22. Hall K, 1996, Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 279
  23. Hall K, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 430, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0026 · DOI
  24. 10.1525/jlin.1999.9.1-2.184 · DOI
  25. Hall K, 1996, Rethinking Language and Gender Research: Theory and Practice, 228
  26. 10.1525/aa.1964.66.suppl_3.02a00010 · DOI
  27. 10.1525/sp.2005.52.4.477 · DOI
  28. Leap WL, 1996, Word’s Out: Gay Men’s English
  29. Livia A, 2000, Pronoun Envy, 10.1093/oso/9780195138528.001.0001 · DOI
  30. Livia A, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 3, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0001 · DOI
  31. Mendoza-Denton N, 1999, Speaking Chicana: Voice, Power, and Identity, 39
  32. Pratt ML, 1987, The Linguistics of Writing: Arguments between Language and Literature, 48
  33. Queen R, 1997, Queerly Phrased: Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 233, 10.1093/oso/9780195104707.003.0014 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 · DOI
  35. Warner M, 1999, The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life
  36. 10.1215/9780822394945 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hall, K.
Affiliations
University of Colorado, USA
Corresponding author
Hall, Kira
Venue
Discourse & Society
Published
2013-09
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
634-642
ISSN
  • 0957-9265 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3624
OpenAlex
W2046542088
Cited by
62
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
5.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Discourse & Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies in Language
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
queer linguistics, indexicality, subjectivity, queer theory, heteronormativity, semiotics, social meaning, hijrah, language and social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review