Beyond voice: an onto-epistemological analysis of maternal transition inquiry
Open accessAbstract
The maternal transition is a key concept for studying first-time motherhood. Whilst qualitative research in this space has contributed much to understanding the psychological and sociocultural shifts in this transition, a broad adoption of conventional humanistic qualitative methodologies has produced linear and rather homogenous knowledges. In this article, we interrogate the onto-epistemological repercussions of such inquiry and cut into this work by plugging into feminist/new materialisms and critical posthumanism. We trace the trail of qualitative maternal transition literature by examining methodologies and methods to think through the limits and potentialities of their knowledge-production capacity. We read across the research practices of 56 maternal transition articles spanning the past 5 decades. We found most reside within a liberal humanist framework, which inevitably positions mothers as rational, agentic, disembodied, and responsible actors. We explore what is in-between, missing, or could be in future becoming-mother research assemblages. Through thinking with feminist/new materialist and critical posthuman theories as inquiry pathways, we open up the maternal transition as a constantly evolving and fluctuating process of becoming-mother. Findings underscore the importance of diversifying theory and methodologies in studying first-time motherhood and paying greater attention to the relations between human and non-human agencies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is a robust and growing international qualitative literature on maternal subjectivities, predominantly focused on Global North contexts.
“While there is a robust and growing international qualitative literature on maternal subjectivities (predominantly focused on Global North contexts) (27–29), there is a considerably lower amount that draws on qualitative longitudinal research (QLR), a significant gap given the highly dynamic nature of maternal subjectivities over time.”
Cites
Cronin-Fisher, V., & Parcell, E. S. (2019) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2019.1590364 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Athan, A., & Reel, H. L. (2015) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353514562804 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Torres, N. F., Watson, D., Mohlomi, L., Hlungwani, T., Gardiner, C. V., Muller-Kluits, N., Norris, S. A., Draper, C. E., & Pentecost, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Global Women's Health · doi:10.3389/fgwh.2026.1880613
- Authors
- Neely, E., Pettie, M., & Henderson, E.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Open Polytechnic of New Zealand, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
- Corresponding author
- Neely, Eva
- Venue
- Feminism & Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-09-16
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-271
- ISSN
- 0959-3535 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7161
- OpenAlex
- W4386803082
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Feminism & Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Victoria University of Wellington
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- first-time motherhood, onto-epistemology, feminist new materialism, critical posthumanism, human-nonhuman relations, knowledge production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review