Cited by 306Gender Roles and Identity StudiesGender and Feminist StudiesAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology

Sex Differences in Emotionality: Fact or Stereotype?

Fischer, Agneta H.·1993·Feminism & Psychology

Abstract

One consistent element of Western sex stereotypes is that women are emotional, whereas men are rational. This is also widely spread in psychology and defended by feminist authors who equate women's relationality with their emotionality. In this article the concept of `emotionality' is criticized and the assumption that women are generally more emotional than men is questioned. A large amount of empirical research on sex differences in emotions is reviewed, leading to the conclusion that the general idea that women are more emotional than men tells us more about Western sex stereotypes than about women's actual emotions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0959353593033002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceptions of gender differences in emotional responding constitute one of the most robust gender stereotypes.

    “Perceptions of gender differences in emotional responding constitute one of the most robust gender stereotypes there is (Fabes & Martin, 1991; Fischer, 1993; Grossman & Wood, 1993; Hess et al., 2000; Plant, Hyde, Keltner, & Devine, 2000; Timmers, Fischer, & Manstead, 2003).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 77 · Cited by 306

Authors
Fischer, A. H.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Fischer, Agneta H.
Venue
Feminism & Psychology
Published
1993-10
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
303-318
ISSN
  • 0959-3535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7161
OpenAlex
W2109840157
Cited by
306
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Feminism & Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › General Psychology › Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Keywords
emotionality, gender stereotypes, women's emotions, gender and emotion, feminist criticism, relationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review