Late-Holocene paleoclimate and treeline fluctuation in Wyoming’s Wind River Range, USA
Abstract
This study presents evidence for treeline advance in the central Rocky Mountains, United States, between 1800 and 800 cal. yr BP. This evidence was generated by systematic survey, sampling, and accelerator-mass spectrometer (AMS) dating of remnant Pinus albicaulis above the modern treeline ecotone of Union Peak, in the Wind River Range of western Wyoming. The survey identified 257 tree remnants, of which AMS dates were generated on 15 samples. Based on AMS results, it appears that treeline was approximately 100 m higher in elevation and covered an additional 1 km of horizontal distance for approximately a millennium, 1800–800 cal. yr BP. These findings are surprising given the tendency of remnant forests across the region to date to the middle Holocene but are consistent with regional evidence for increases in effective moisture that are contemporaneous with the Union Peak treeline advance. The age of death for most of the sampled trees occurred, however, near 800 cal. yr BP, 200 or more years prior to the onset of the type of regional and hemispheric temperature decreases that might be expected to result in treeline decline. Given the contemporaneity of the Union Peak treeline decline with a substantial regional megadrought 820–780 cal. yr BP, it is hypothesized that declining moisture availability played a fundamental role in this phenomenon. If true, the late-Holocene advance and subsequent decline of treeline on Union Peak would emphasize the role effective moisture plays…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
“Past fire activity is interpreted from historical sources such as observational records and maps of area burned (Morgan, Losey, & Trout, 2014), and from palaeoecologi-cal proxy archives such as fire scars in tree-rings, tree age structures, charcoal particles preserved in sediments and organic…”
- Authors
- Morgan, C., Losey, A., & Trout, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Reno (US)
- Utah State University (US)
- ORCID
- Morgan, Christopher
- Venue
- The Holocene
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-219
- ISSN
- 0959-6836 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0911
- OpenAlex
- W1983088346
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Holocene (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Utah State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Tree-ring climate responses
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- Late Holocene, paleoclimate, Pinus albicaulis, remnant forest, Wind River Range, central Rocky Mountains, effective moisture, megadrought, dendrochronology, paleotemperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review