Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nanotechnology: History and future

Hulla, JE, Sahu, SC, Hayes, AW·2015·Human & Experimental Toxicology

Abstract

Human dreams and imagination often give rise to new science and technology. Nanotechnology, a 21st-century frontier, was born out of such dreams. Nanotechnology is defined as the understanding and control of matter at dimensions between 1 and 100 nm where unique phenomena enable novel applications. Although human exposure to nanoparticles has occurred throughout human history, it dramatically increased during the industrial revolution. The study of nanoparticles is not new. The concept of a ‘‘nanometer’’ was first proposed by Richard Zsigmondy, the 1925 Nobel Prize Laureate in chemistry. He coined the term nanometer explicitly for characterizing particle size and he was the first to measure the size of particles such as gold colloids using a microscope. Modern nanotechnology was the brain child of Richard Feynman, the 1965 Nobel Prize Laureate in physics. During the 1959 American Physical Society meeting at Caltech, he presented a lecture titled, ‘‘There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom’’, in which he introduced the concept of manipulating matter at the atomic level. This novel idea demonstrated new ways of thinking and Feynman’s hypotheses have since been proven correct. It is for these reasons that he is considered the father of modern nanotechnology. Almost 15 years after Feynman’s lecture, a Japanese scientist, Norio Taniguchi, was the first to use ‘‘nanotechnology’’ to describe semiconductor processes that occurred on the order of a nanometer. He advocated that nanotechnology consisted of the processing, separation, consolidation, and deformation of materials by one atom or one molecule. The golden era of nanotechnology began in the 1980s when Kroto, Smalley, and Curl discovered fullerenes and Eric Drexler of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) used ideas from Feynman’s ‘‘There is Plenty of Room at the Bottom’’ and Taniguchi’s term nanotechnology in his 1986 book titled, ‘‘Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology.’’ Drexler proposed the idea of a nanoscale ‘‘assembler’’ which would be able to build a copy of itself and of other items of arbitrary complexity. Drexler’s vision of nanotechnology is often called ‘‘molecular nanotechnology.’’ The science of nanotechnology was advanced further when Iijima, another Japanese scientist, developed carbon nanotubes. The beginning of the 21st century saw an increased interest in the emerging fields of nanoscience and nanotechnology. In the United States, Feynman’s stature and his concept of manipulation of matter at the atomic level played an important role in shaping national science priorities. President Bill Clinton advocated for funding of research in this emerging technology during a speech at Caltech on January 21, 2000. Three years later, President George W. Bush signed into law the 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act. The legislation made nanotechnology research a national priority and created the National Technology Initiative (NNI). Today, the NNI is managed within a framework at the top of which is the President’s Cabinet-level National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) and its Committee on Technology. The Committee’s Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology (NSET) is responsible for planning, budgeting, implementation, and review of the NNI and is comprised of representatives from 20 US departments and independent agencies and commissions (Table 1).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0960327115603588

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Hulla, J., Sahu, S., & Hayes, A.
Venue
Human & Experimental Toxicology
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
1318-1321
ISSN
  • 0960-3271 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0903
OpenAlex
W2277186739
Cited by
423
References
20
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nanotechnology: History and future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0960327115603588
The paper
Hulla, J., Sahu, S., & Hayes, A. (2015). Nanotechnology: History and future. Human & Experimental Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327115603588

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.