Cited by 77

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.

Anti-malarial drugs: possible mechanisms of action in autoimmune disease and prospects for drug development

Fox, R·1996·Lupus

Abstract

A wide variety of mechanisms of anti-rheumatic action have been proposed for antimalarial agents. The molecular actions of chloroquine have been most thoroughly studied in vitro and in vivo, but it is likely that hydroxychloroquine works by a similar mechanism. Both agents are weak diprotic bases that can pass through the lipid cell membrane and preferentially concentrate in acidic cyto-plasmic vesicles. The resulting slight elevation of pH within these vesicles in macrophages or other antigen-presenting cells may influence the immune response to autoantigens. We hypothesize that anti-malarial agents influence the association of autoantigenic peptides with class II MHC molecules in the compartment for peptide loading and/or the subsequent processing and transport of the peptide-MHC complex to the cell membrane. This model of anti-malarial action provides a method to test additional drugs for their ability to modulate the immune response.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0961203396005001031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In phagocytic cells, deacidification of endosomes using chloroquine reduces endosomal toll-like receptor response.

    “In phagocytic cells, the deacidification of endosomes using pharmacological inhibitors like chloroquine has been shown to reduce endosomal toll-like receptor (TLR) response (de Bouteiller et al., 2005; Fox, 2019; Kuznik et al., 2011; Wozniacka et al., 2006; Yang et al., 2016)”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 41

  1. Wallace D., 1994, Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 20, 243, 10.1016/S0889-857X(21)00233-7 · DOI
  2. 10.1146/annurev.iy.02.040184.002143 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0049-0172(78)90033-1 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/348039a0 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/345172a0 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.79.1.175 · DOI
  7. 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3327 · DOI
  8. 10.1172/JCI115614 · DOI
  9. 10.1038/366069a0 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/366072a0 · DOI
  11. 10.1084/jem.176.4.1107 · DOI
  12. 10.1073/pnas.90.3.786 · DOI
  13. 10.1038/357702a0 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/348600a0 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/0167-5699(93)90163-F · DOI
  16. Teyton L, 1992, New Biol, 4, 441
  17. Mamula MJ, 1992, J Immunol, 149, 789, 10.4049/jimmunol.149.3.789 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/0167-5699(91)90052-U · DOI
  19. 10.1126/science.7985028 · DOI
  20. 10.1038/369103a0 · DOI
  21. 10.1073/pnas.88.8.3150 · DOI
  22. 10.1073/pnas.85.11.3975 · DOI
  23. 10.1084/jem.171.5.1779 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.86.2.544 · DOI
  25. 10.1038/369120a0 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/369113a0 · DOI
  27. 10.1038/235050a0 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80399-4 · DOI
  29. 10.1084/jem.162.4.1371 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90335-2 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0049-0172(10)80012-5 · DOI
  32. 10.1002/art.1780050507 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/art.1780010405 · DOI
  34. 10.1056/NEJM199101173240303 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.54.2.521 · DOI
  36. Filippov A, 1989, Gen Physiol Biophys, 8, 113
  37. Matsuzawa Y, 1980, J Biol Chem, 255, 5190, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)70769-8 · DOI
  38. Hurst N, 1988, J Rheumatol, 15, 23
  39. 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91266-4 · DOI
  40. 10.1093/infdis/164.4.830 · DOI
  41. Naimiuchi S, 1984, J Immunol, 123, 1456, 10.4049/jimmunol.132.3.1456 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fox, R.
Affiliations
Division of Rheumatology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California
Venue
Lupus
Published
1996-06
Volume
5
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
4-10
ISSN
  • 0961-2033
  • 1477-0962
Cited by
77
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review