Cited by 725Social and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral BehaviorDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Us and Them: Intergroup Failures of Empathy

Open access
Cikara, Mina, Bruneau, Emile G., Saxe, Rebecca R.·2011·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

People are often motivated to increase others' positive experiences and to alleviate others' suffering. These tendencies to care about and help one another form the foundation of human society. When the target is an outgroup member, however, people may have powerful motivations not to care about or help that “other.” In such cases, empathic responses are rare and fragile; it is easy to disrupt the chain from perception of suffering to motivation to alleviate the suffering to actual helping. We highlight recent interdisciplinary research demonstrating that outgroup members' suffering elicits dampened empathic responses as compared to ingroup members' suffering. We consider an alternative to empathy in the context of intergroup competition: schadenfreude—pleasure at others' pain. Finally, we review recent investigations of intergroup-conflict interventions that attempt to increase empathy for outgroups. We propose that researchers across the range of psychological sciences stand to gain a better understanding of the foundations of empathy by studying its limitations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721411408713

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 725

Authors
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. R.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Cikara, Mina
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2011-06
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
149-153
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2125241848
Cited by
725
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
59.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
empathy, outgroup members, in-group favoritism, schadenfreude, intergroup conflict, helping behavior, compassion fade, empathy interventions, intergroup competition, altruism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review