Cited by 115Writing and Handwriting EducationReading and Literacy DevelopmentTactile and Sensory Interactions

The importance of handwriting experience on the development of the literate brain

James, Karin H.·2017·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Handwriting experience can have significant effects on the ability of young children to recognize letters. Why handwriting has this facilitative effect and how this is accomplished were explored in a series of studies using overt behavioral measures and functional neuroimaging of the brain in 4- to 5-year-old children. My colleagues and I showed that early handwriting practice affects visual symbol recognition because it results in the production of variable visual forms that aid in symbol understanding. Further, the mechanisms that support this understanding lay in the communication between visual and motor systems in the brain: Handwriting serves to link visual processing with motor experience, facilitating subsequent letter recognition skills. These results are interpreted in the larger context of the facilitatory effect that learning through action has on perceptual capabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721417709821

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lack of handwriting experience when learning to read and write ultimately impacts reading and other related cognitive skills.

    “Researchers have noted that a lack of handwriting experience when learning to read and write ultimately impacts reading and other related cognitive skills.”
  • Longhand writing engages the motor and sensorimotor areas of the brain.

    “Moreover, there is evidence that longhand writing engages the motor and sensorimotor areas of the brain (James, 2017; Mueller and Oppenheimer, 2014), increasing links between thought and future action tendencies.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 115

Authors
James, K. H.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
James, Karin H.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
502-508
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2767236073
Cited by
115
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
24.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
handwriting, letter recognition, visual-motor integration, early childhood, learning through action, perceptual development, literacy development, young children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review