The importance of handwriting experience on the development of the literate brain
Abstract
Handwriting experience can have significant effects on the ability of young children to recognize letters. Why handwriting has this facilitative effect and how this is accomplished were explored in a series of studies using overt behavioral measures and functional neuroimaging of the brain in 4- to 5-year-old children. My colleagues and I showed that early handwriting practice affects visual symbol recognition because it results in the production of variable visual forms that aid in symbol understanding. Further, the mechanisms that support this understanding lay in the communication between visual and motor systems in the brain: Handwriting serves to link visual processing with motor experience, facilitating subsequent letter recognition skills. These results are interpreted in the larger context of the facilitatory effect that learning through action has on perceptual capabilities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lack of handwriting experience when learning to read and write ultimately impacts reading and other related cognitive skills.
“Researchers have noted that a lack of handwriting experience when learning to read and write ultimately impacts reading and other related cognitive skills.”
From Human Intelligence, Creativity, and Wisdom in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence (2025) · cites this paper as James, 2017
Longhand writing engages the motor and sensorimotor areas of the brain.
“Moreover, there is evidence that longhand writing engages the motor and sensorimotor areas of the brain (James, 2017; Mueller and Oppenheimer, 2014), increasing links between thought and future action tendencies.”
From A hope intervention for adolescents: a randomized controlled trial delivered by paraprofessionals (2025) · cites this paper as James, 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- James, K. H.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- James, Karin H.
- ORCID
- James, Karin H.
- Venue
- Current Directions in Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-11-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 502-508
- ISSN
- 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-8721
- OpenAlex
- W2767236073
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 24.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- handwriting, letter recognition, visual-motor integration, early childhood, learning through action, perceptual development, literacy development, young children
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review