The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Moral stress, moral climate and moral sensitivity among psychiatric professionals
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between work-related moral stress, moral climate and moral sensitivity in mental health nursing. By means of the three scales Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire and Work-Related Moral Stress, 49 participants’ experiences were assessed. The results of linear regression analysis indicated that moral stress was determined to a degree by the work place’s moral climate as well as by two aspects of the mental health staff’s moral sensitivity. The nurses’ experience of ‘moral burden’ or ‘moral support’ increased or decreased their experience of moral stress. Their work-related moral stress was determined by the job-associated moral climate and two aspects of moral sensitivity. Our findings showed an association between three concepts: moral sensitivity, moral climate and moral stress. Despite being a small study, the findings seem relevant for future research leading to theory development and conceptual clarity. We suggest that more attention be given to methodological issues and developing designs that allow for comparative research in other disciplines, as well as in-depth knowledge of moral agency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Moral Distress in Nursing Practice: Experience and Effect
Wilkinson, J. M. (1987) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6198.1987.tb00794.x · Cited by 521
Cited by
Development and Testing of an Instrument to Measure Moral Distress in Healthcare Professionals
Hamric, A. B., Borchers, C. T., & Epstein, E. G. (2012) · AJOB Primary Research · doi:10.1080/21507716.2011.652337 · Cited by 623
Moral Distress Among Healthcare Professionals: Report of an Institution‐Wide Survey
Whitehead, P. B., Herbertson, R. K., Hamric, A. B., Epstein, E. G., & Fisher, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.12115 · Cited by 512
Relationship between ICU nurses’ moral distress with burnout and anticipated turnover
Shoorideh, F. A., Ashktorab, T., Yaghmaei, F., & Alavi Majd, H. (2015) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733014534874 · Cited by 212
Prevalence of severe moral distress among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia
Almutairi, A. F., Salam, M., Adlan, A., & Alturki, A. (2019) · Psychology Research and Behavior Management · doi:10.2147/prbm.s191037 · Cited by 62
Chinese nurses’ perceived barriers and facilitators of ethical sensitivity
Huang, F. F., Yang, Q., Zhang, J., Khoshnood, K., & Zhang, J. P. (2016) · Nursing Ethics · doi:10.1177/0969733015574925 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Lützén, K., Blom, T., Ewalds-Kvist, B., & Winch, S.
- Venue
- Nursing Ethics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-02-25
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-224
- ISSN
- 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2164380905
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Moral stress, moral climate and moral sensitivity among psychiatric professionals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0969733009351951
- The paper
- Lützén, K., Blom, T., Ewalds-Kvist, B., & Winch, S. (2010). Moral stress, moral climate and moral sensitivity among psychiatric professionals. Nursing Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733009351951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.