CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 68Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareEthics and bioethics in healthcareEthics in medical practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Attentiveness in care: towards a theoretical framework.

Klaver, Klaartje, Baart, Andries·2011·Nursing Ethics
DOI 10.1177/0969733011408052
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to shape a theoretical framework of attentiveness in care, which may function as a background to study attentiveness in a health care setting empirically. More insight into the functions, forms, and aspects of attentiveness in a particular health care setting is important, as there is a lack of indicators and criteria that enable a sharp picture of the caring side of health provision. The concept of attentiveness and its relation to care have seldom been examined thoroughly and broadly. This article argues that attentiveness is constitutive for good care, as it can create a space in which a relationship may arise.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733011408052

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Council for Public Health and Health Care., 2006, Confidence in responsible care? The effects of performance indicators and moral issues associated with their use
  2. Heijst A van., 2008, Iemand zien staan. Zorgethiek over erkenning. (Seeing someone. Ethics of care on recognition.)
  3. Heijst A van., 2005, Menslievende zorg. Een ethische kijk op professionaliteit. (Professional loving care. An ethical view on professionality.)
  4. Baart A., 2008, Verpleegkunde en presentie. Een zoektocht in dialoog naar de betekenis van presentie voor verpleegkundige zorg. (Nursing and presence. A search for the meaning of presence for nursing care.)
  5. Baart A., 2001, Een theorie van de presentie. (A theory of presence.)
  6. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  7. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  8. Casey M., 2005, An unexciting life. Reflections on Benedictine spirituality
  9. Verhoeven C., 1972, The philosophy of wonder
  10. Baart A. Aandacht., 2004, Etudes in presentie. (Attention. Etudes in presence.)
  11. Rankin J., 2009, Forum Qualitative Social Research, 10, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 68

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klaver, K., & Baart, A.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Klaver, Klaartje
ORCID
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-07-25
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
686-693
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
DOI
10.1177/0969733011408052
OpenAlex
W2112242163
Cited by
68
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
attentiveness, care, theoretical framework, health care, care relationships, good care, clinician attitudes
MeSH terms
Attention, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Nurse-Patient Relations, Nursing Care, Models, Nursing, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attentiveness in care: towards a theoretical framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0969733011408052
The paper
Klaver, K., & Baart, A. (2011). Attentiveness in care: towards a theoretical framework. Nursing Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011408052