Cited by 46Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

The influence of individualistic and collectivistic morality on dementia care choices

Hanssen, Ingrid, Tran, Phuong Thai Minh·2019·Nursing Ethics

Abstract

Background: If collectivistic-oriented family carers choose professional care for dependents with dementia, they risk being stigmatised as failing their obligation. This may influence dementia care choices. Research question: How may individualistic and collectivistic values influence choices in dementia care? Method: Qualitative design with in-depth interviews with a total of 29 nurses, 13 family members in Norway and the Balkans and 3 Norwegian dementia care coordinators. A hermeneutic content-focused analysis was used. Ethical considerations: Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee for Research, South-Eastern Norway, and the nursing homes’ leadership. Findings: Family domain reasons why institutionalisation of dependents with dementia was seen as a last resort: obligation towards family members, particularly parents; worry about other family members’ reactions and inability to cope with the care for the person with dementia. Social domain reasons: feelings of shame and stigma regarding dementia, particularly in connection with institutionalisation of family members. Discussion: Children’s obligation towards their parents is an important aspect of the morality of collectivistic societies. Institutionalising parents with dementia may cause feelings of guilt and shame and worry about being stigmatised and ostracised. To avoid blame and rejection, caregiver(s) try to keep the fact that family members have dementia ‘in the family’. The decision to accept professional healthcare for dependents with severe dementia or have them admitted to a geriatric institution was postponed as long as possible. Conclusion: Family care morality may constitute a significant barrier against seeking professional help for persons with dementia, a barrier based on the expectation that the family will care for their old, even when suffering from severe dementia. Hence, stigma and shame may significantly affect the provision of care. Culturally tailored information may encourage family carers to seek professional help before the disruptive influence of the disease makes institutionalisation the only feasible option.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0969733018791342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 46

Authors
Hanssen, I., & Tran, P. T. M.
Affiliations
Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO)
Corresponding author
Hanssen, Ingrid
Venue
Nursing Ethics
Published
2018-09-10
Volume
26
Issue
7-8
Pages
2047-2057
ISSN
  • 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0989
OpenAlex
W2891685245
Cited by
46
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
dementia care, family caregivers, individualism, collectivism, cultural values, stigma, shame, institutionalization, family responsibilities, nursing homes
MeSH terms
Dementia, Humans, Morals, Norway, Quality of Health Care, Caregivers, Qualitative Research, Balkan Peninsula, Hermeneutics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review