The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethics simulation in nursing education: Nursing students' experiences
Open accessAbstract
Background: Ethics stimulation in nursing education focuses on human, non-technical factors in a clinical reality. Simulation as a teaching method began in the 1930s with flight simulators. In the beginning of the 1990s, simulations developed further in tandem with other technological and digital inventions, including touchscreen and three-dimensional anatomical models. Medical science first used simulation as a pedagogical teaching tool. In nursing education, simulation has been used for approximately a hundred years. Teaching has mainly focused on medical-technical, patient-specific interventions and their management. Objective: The objective of this study was, from a caring science didactic perspective, to deepen the understanding of ethics simulation in nursing education. Design: Qualitative design and explorative, descriptive and hermeneutic approach of an inductive character. Methods: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews in 2016–2017 with six Norwegian nursing students who were encouraged to narrate about their experiences of ethics simulation in nursing education. Ethical considerations: Informed consent was obtained from the participants. Anonymity and confidentiality regarding data material were guaranteed. Results: Interpretation of the nursing students’ narratives resulted in the following meaning units: ethical being and ethos, nursing students’ formation process, bridge-building between theory and clinical practice, and teacher and ethics simulation. Conclusion: Through ethics simulation, nursing students can obtain an increased knowledge and a sense of being able to handle difficult ethical situations. Nursing students’ values, moral actions and ethical value base offer a positive point of departure, for both theoretical and practical ethics teaching, and an awareness of the unique human being, the patient, in clinical reality. The implementation of ethics simulation needs more attention in nursing education.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Simultaneously, there is a need for healthcare professionals and students to formulate their thoughts, feelings, and intentions about the ethical problems that they have observed themselves or heard about through colleagues [37, 38, 41, 43, 45].”
From Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Finally, it is essential to create conditions for psychological safety and confidence in ethics education, or, in other words, to enable opportunities to express opinions or make blunders without this leading to consequences for the participants [41].”
From Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
In the citing paper
“Being aware of one’s own thoughts and perceptions in one’s attitudes and approaches to circumstances such as a certain illness, patient, or event influence what is perceived as an ethical problem in clinical practice [41, 70].”
From Ethics education to support ethical competence learning in healthcare: an integrative systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
Cites
Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: Meta-analysis
Shin, S., Park, J.-H., & Kim, J.-H. (2015) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009 · Cited by 543 · cited 4×
“Simulation exercises take place within specific laboratory-like circumstances in a safe, controlled and repetitive manner.(3,4) The integration of information technology and e-learning in the curriculum requires new pedagogic language and professional didactic skills.”
BackgroundInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31820f9a55 · DOI
- 10.5480/15-1578 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1891/9780826125453 · DOI
- 10.1177/0969733014523166 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9780203115923 · DOI
- World Health Organization (WHO), 2013, Transforming and scaling up health professionals´ education and training
- 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01426.x · DOI
- 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man06 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00964.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0969733011423559 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.profnurs.2012.04.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Smith SJ, 2009, Nurs Educ Perspect, 30, 74
- 10.1111/j.1440-1800.2009.00482.x · DOI
- 10.1177/0969733010386163 · DOI
- 10.1177/0146167209350326 · DOI
- Senge PM, 2006, The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization
- 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01468.x · DOI
- Eriksson K, 2001, Vårdvetenskap som akademisk disciplin
- Matilainen D, 2004, Vårdvetenskapens didaktik, caritativ didaktik i vårdandets tjänst
- Eriksson K, 2006, Hoitotiede, 18, 296
- 10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/0969733010361440 · DOI
- 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.7.435 · DOI
- 10.3928/01484834-20110429-04 · DOI
- Keskitalo T, 2015, Developing a pedagogical model for simulation-based healthcare education (Acta Universitatis Lapponiensis, 299
- 10.3928/01484834-20090518-07 · DOI
- 10.1111/jan.12174 · DOI
- 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.03795.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.015 · DOI
- 10.3928/01484834-20090828-08 · DOI
- Sedgwick M, 2020, Epub ahead of print, 3
- 10.3928/01484834-20200122-06 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04798.x · DOI
- 10.1177/1046878112439649 · DOI
- Polit D, 2017, Essentials of nursing research: appraising evidence for nursing practice
- Gadamer H-G, 2013, Truth and method
- Kvale S, 2014, The qualitative research interview
- 10.1111/jmwh.12185 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0969733011412103 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04257.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.12.001 · DOI
Cited by
Andersson, H., Svensson, A., Frank, C., Rantala, A., Holmberg, M., & Bremer, A. (2022) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-022-00766-z · Cited by 338
“Simultaneously, there is a need for healthcare professionals and students to formulate their thoughts, feelings, and intentions about the ethical problems that they have observed themselves or heard about through colleagues [37, 38, 41, 43, 45].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Honkavuo, L.
- Affiliations
- Åbo Akademi University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Honkavuo, Leena
- ORCID
- Honkavuo, Leena
- Venue
- Nursing Ethics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-04-08
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 1269-1281
- ISSN
- 0969-7330 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0989
- OpenAlex
- W3146458168
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 4.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nursing Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- nursing education, nursing students' experiences, ethos, ethics education, moral values, simulation-based training
- MeSH terms
- Education, Nursing, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Ethics, Nursing, Humans, Morals, Students, Nursing, Hermeneutics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
