The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?: Communality, Sociality, and Connectivity in Project Ecologies
Abstract
This paper seeks to contrast two opposing logics of project-based learning. Accumulation and modularization of knowledge denote the key imperatives of a learning logic that is exemplified by the software ecology in Munich. Learning is geared towards moving from ‘one-off’ to repeatable solutions. This cumulative logic is juxtaposed with a discontinuous learning regime that is driven by the maxims of originality and creativity. ‘Learning by switching’ here signifies the emblematic knowledge practice that is exemplified by the London advertising ecology. The paper explores these learning modes by subsequently exploring processes of learning and forgetting within and between the core team, the firm, and the epistemic community tied together for the completion of a specific project. In addition, the paper also directs attention to more diffuse learning processes in an awareness space that extends beyond and beneath the actual production ties. Instead of mapping the awareness space along a simplistic scalar nesting of network density and knowledge types (reduced to the notorious global vs local dichotomy), the paper proposes a differentiation that primarily involves different social and communicative logics. Whereas communality signifies lasting and intense ties, sociality signifies intense and yet ephemeral relations and connectivity indicates transient and weak networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113 · cited 2×
“complementing ‘single-loop learning’ ( Argyris and Schon 1978 ) around individual”
Swift Trust and Temporary Groups
Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996) · Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research · doi:10.4135/9781452243610.n9 · Cited by 1,982 · cited 2×
“( Meyerson, Weick and Kramer 1996 ) which, most importantly, is category -driven”
Background
Cited by
How Nonemployer Firms Stage-Manage Ad Hoc Collaboration: An Activity Theory Analysis
Spinuzzi, C. (2014) · Technical Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10572252.2013.797334 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Grabher, G.
- Venue
- European Urban and Regional Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-123
- ISSN
- 0969-7764 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7145
- OpenAlex
- W2125897519
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 42.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?: Communality, Sociality, and Connectivity in Project Ecologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0969776404041417
- The paper
- Grabher, G. (2004). Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?: Communality, Sociality, and Connectivity in Project Ecologies. European Urban and Regional Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776404041417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.