Digital Technology Adoption in SMEs: What Technological, Environmental and Organizational Factors Influence in Emerging Countries?
Abstract
The research aims to explore the technological, environmental and organizational factors that influence digital technology adoption in the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) sector in developing countries. A conceptual framework is proposed that combines the technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework and diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory to explore the determinants of digital technology, for example, information and communication technology (ICT) applicability in SMEs. In addition, this study identifies the major barriers to implementing ICT in the SMEs sector. A purposive 535 sample was accumulated from higher- and middle-level managers of SMEs firms through a structured questionnaire. Data and hypotheses were analyzed using partial least squares-structural equation modelling. Results show that relative advantage, complexity, observability, perceived cost, top management support, innovativeness of top management, competitive pressure and government support have significant determinants of ICT adoption in SMEs. Besides, compatibility, perceived trialability and organization readiness have not significantly influenced to use of ICT in SMEs. This research has crucial implications for practising managers, policymakers and SMEs business owners. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is perhaps one of the first empirical surveys that widely provides a theoretical framework regarding ICT adoption in SMEs in Bangladesh.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Integrating RBV, DC, and TOE frameworks provides a comprehensive understanding of AI adoption and value creation potential in SMEs across developing economies.
“The adoption and value creation potential of AI in SMEs across developing economies can be comprehensively understood by integrating three complementary theoretical frameworks: the RBV, DC, and TOE (Almashawreh et al., 2024; Badghish & Soomro, 2024; Shahadat et al., 2023).”
From Artificial Intelligence Adoption for Sustainable Development in SMEs: Challenges, Strategic Pathways, and Lessons for Developing Economies (2026) · cites this paper as Shahadat et al., 2023
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 247
- Authors
- Shahadat, M. M. H., Nekmahmud, M., Ebrahimi, P., & Fekete-Farkas, M.
- Affiliations
- Magyar Agrár- és Élettudományi Egyetem (HU)
- Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Szent Istvan Campus, Gödöllő, Hungary
- Corresponding author
- Nekmahmud, Md.
- Venue
- Global Business Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-01-09
- ISSN
- 0972-1509 (ISSN-L)
- 0973-0664
- OpenAlex
- W4313827812
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 76 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 34
- FWCI
- 63.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2023-02-07)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Business Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Keywords
- digital technology adoption, small and medium-sized enterprises, ICT adoption, technology-organization-environment framework, diffusion of innovation theory, barriers to ICT adoption, top management support, government support, competitive pressure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review