The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Good to Great - (Why Some Companies Make the Leap and others Don't)
Abstract
Answers to commonly asked questions about how good-to-great principles can help social sector organizations make the leap to greatness, using interviews with over 100 social sector leaders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 · Cited by 4,849
Servant Leadership: A Review and Synthesis
van Dierendonck, D. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310380462 · Cited by 2,218
The Servant Leadership Survey: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure
van Dierendonck, D., & Nuijten, I. (2011) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9194-1 · Cited by 1,096
Ou, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Kinicki, A. J., Waldman, D. A., Xiao, Z., & Song, L. J. (2014) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839213520131 · Cited by 561
(2003) · Cited by 551
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, J.
- Venue
- NHRD Network Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 102-105
- ISSN
- 2631-4541 (ISSN-L)
- 2631-455X
- OpenAlex
- W1879787360
- Cited by
- 1,980
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Good to Great - (Why Some Companies Make the Leap and others Don't). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0974173920090719
- The paper
- Collins, J. (2009). Good to Great - (Why Some Companies Make the Leap and others Don't). NHRD Network Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974173920090719
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
