Determinants of Adherence to Iron/Folate Supplementation During Pregnancy in Two Provinces in Cambodia
Abstract
Iron supplementation can effectively control and prevent anemia in pregnancy. However, limited adherence is thought to be a major reason for the low effectiveness of iron supplementation programs.This research describes the factors influencing the adherence to iron/folate supplementation during pregnancy in Siem Reap and Kampong Cham provinces in Cambodia.Triangulation method, combining the quantitative and qualitative data collection methods, was performed for this study. A total of 177 women who gave birth during the year prior to the interview were selected for the quantitative survey. Ten women who gave birth during the year prior to the interview and 10 pregnant women were interviewed in-depth for the qualitative data.The χ 2 test and binary logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. The findings showed an adherence rate of 47%. The logistic regression revealed that the number of supplements received, number of prenatal visits, and access to antenatal care were determinants of adherence ( P < .05). In conclusion, access to and follow-up of antenatal care were considered elements essential to improve iron/folate supplementation. Community-based interventions, such as nutrition education and distribution of supplements, should be prioritized in the interventions to improve adherence in Cambodia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies conducted in Cambodia and Sweden found that awareness of mothers is associated with improved iron supplementation utilization.
“Previous studies conducted in Cambodia [20] and Sweden [25] also came up with parallel findings.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Lacerte, P., Pradipasen, M., Temcharoen, P., Imamee, N., & Vorapongsathorn, T.
- Affiliations
- Mahidol University (TH)
- Corresponding author
- Pradipasen, Mandhana
- Venue
- Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 315-323
- ISSN
- 1010-5395 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-2479
- OpenAlex
- W2116607367
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Public Health and Nutrition
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
- Keywords
- iron and folic acid supplementation, medication adherence, pregnancy, anemia in pregnancy, prenatal care, antenatal care visits, health care access, women's health, Cambodia, nutrition education, community-based intervention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anemia, Cambodia, Female, Folic Acid, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Iron, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic, Prenatal Care, Anemia, Iron-Deficiency, Dietary Supplements, Qualitative Research, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review