Cited by 14Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Anxiety Symptom Severity and Functional Recovery Or Relapse

Abstract

Background Anxiety disorders are associated with significant disability. There is growing interest in the question of whether pharmacotherapy that effectively reduces symptoms can also restore function. Recovery could potentially be defined as a lack of disability, with an associated reduction in symptom severity. Conversely, relapse could potentially be defined in terms of either increased disability or increased symptoms. Methods We analyzed a database of randomized controlled trials of escitalopram in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and social anxiety disorder (SAD), focusing on the relationship between disorder-specific severity scales, and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). In short-term studies, cut-points on symptom scales were derived for recovered function. In relapse prevention studies, the effects of defining relapse in terms of increased disability scores were examined. Results In GAD and SAD, there is a close correlation between primary symptom severity scales and the SDS, both in the short term and during relapse prevention. Thus, functional recovery is associated with relatively low symptom severity scores, and rates of relapse-defined in terms of increased disability-are significantly lower on escitalopram than on placebo. Conclusions These data indicate that recovery and relapse can potentially be defined either in terms of symptom severity or functioning. Thus, the concept of functional recovery and relapse may be useful in defining treatment outcomes. L…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104012370902100204

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1056/NEJMsa043266 · DOI · Paper page
  4. MogotsiM KaminerD SteinDJ. Quality of life in the anxiety disorders. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2000;8:273–282. · DOI
  5. KesslerRC. The epidemiology of pure and comorbid generalized anxiety disorder: a review and evaluation of recent research. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 2000;(406):7–13. · DOI
  6. 10.1177/0269881105059253 · DOI · Paper page
  7. ChisholmD SandersonK Ayuso-MateosJL . Reducing the global burden of depression: population-level analysis of intervention cost-effectiveness in 14 world regions. Br J Psychiatry. 2004;164:393–403. · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1159/000414022 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1192/bjp.187.4.366 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/sj.npp.1301147 · DOI
  12. BandelowB BaldwinDS DolbergOT . What is the threshold for symptomatic response and remission for major depressive disorder panic disorder social anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder? J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67:1428–1434. · DOI · Paper page
  13. BaldwinDS HuusomAK Mæhlum E. A placebo-controlled, double-blind study of escitalopram and paroxetine in the short-term treatment of generalised anxiety disorder (GAD). Br J Psychiatry. 2006;189:264–272.
  14. AllgulanderC FloreaI HuusomAK. Prevention of relapse in generalized anxiety disorder by escitalopram treatment. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006;9: 495–505. · DOI
  15. 10.1192/bjp.186.3.222 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stein, D. J., Bandelow, B., Dolberg, O. T., Andersen, H. F., & Baldwin, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of Göttingen (DE)
  • Lundbeck (Denmark) (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Stein, Dan J.
Venue
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2009-05
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
81-88
ISSN
  • 1040-1237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-3325
OpenAlex
W129145118
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
anxiety disorders, functional recovery, relapse, symptom severity, Sheehan Disability Scale, escitalopram, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, relapse prevention, disability
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Severity of Illness Index, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Citalopram, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review