The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Porcine Circoviruses: A Review
Abstract
Porcine circoviruses (PCV) are small nonenveloped DNA viruses containing a unique single-stranded circular genome. Previously, no recognized link was found between PCV infection of pigs and disease, and PCV was considered a nonpathogenic agent. Over the last 5 years, a “novel” PCV, designated PCV2, has been associated with various disease syndromes in pigs, primarily postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Pigs with PMWS have a variety of clinical signs, including debility, dyspnea, palpable lymphadenopathy, diarrhea, and pallor or icterus. Lesions associated with the presence of PCV2 in a variety of cell types include lymphohistiocytic to granulomatous interstitial pneumonia, hepatitis, nephritis, myocarditis, enteritis, and pancreatitis. The lesions of PMWS have been reproduced experimentally after inoculation of piglets with PCV2 cell culture isolates, although the full expression of the disease syndrome may require the presence of other agents such as porcine parvovirus or porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus. Recent reports have linked PCV2 to other disorders in pigs, ranging from abortion and reproductive failure to “atypical” PRRS. Available data indicate high seroprevalence of antibodies to PCV2 worldwide. The diagnosis of PCV2-associated disease is based on the direct demonstration of PCV2 antigens or nucleic acid in affected tissues. PCV2 is now regarded as an important emerging pathogen. Although vertical transmission has been documented, the epidemiology of PCV2 infections is poorly understood, as is the role of the immune response in controlling or augmenting disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cleaveland, S., Laurenson, M. K., & Taylor, L. H. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0889 · Cited by 1,188
Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2): Pathogenesis and Interaction with the Immune System
Meng, X.-J. (2013) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103720 · Cited by 310
Liu, J., Chen, I., & Kwang, J. (2005) · Journal of Virology · doi:10.1128/jvi.79.13.8262-8274.2005 · Cited by 300
Structure Unifies the Viral Universe
Abrescia, N. G. A., Bamford, D. H., Grimes, J. M., & Stuart, D. I. (2012) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060910-095130 · Cited by 294
Krakowka, S., Ellis, J. A., McNeilly, F., Ringler, S., Rings, D. M., & Allan, G. (2001) · Veterinary Pathology · doi:10.1354/vp.38-1-31 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Allan, G. M., & Ellis, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1040-6387 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4936
- OpenAlex
- W2146468359
- Cited by
- 798
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 70.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Porcine Circoviruses: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/104063870001200102
- The paper
- Allan, G. M., & Ellis, J. A. (2000). Porcine Circoviruses: A Review. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870001200102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.