Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reproduction of Lesions of Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome in Gnotobiotic Piglets

Open access
Ellis, John, Krakowka, Steven, Lairmore, Michael, Haines, Deborah, Bratanich, Ana, Clark, Edward, Allan, Gordon, Konoby, Carrie, Hassard, Lori, Meehan, Brian, Martin, Karen, Harding, John, Kennedy, Seamus, McNeilly, Francis·1999·Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Abstract

Neonatal gnotobiotic piglets were inoculated with tissue homogenates and low- and high-passage cell culture material to determine if the lesions of the newly described porcine postweaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) could be reproduced. For this, 17 3-day-old gnotobiotic piglets were inoculated intranasally with pelleted chloroform-treated, filtered extracts from cell cultures, filter-sterilized homogenates of lymphoid tissue from PMWS-affected piglets, or control materials. Piglets were maintained in germ-free isolators for up to 5 weeks after infection prior to euthanasia and collection of samples for analysis. All piglets inoculated with the viral inocula developed lesions typical of PMWS, including generalized lymphadenopathy, hepatitis, nephritis, interstitial pneumonia, myocarditis, and gastritis. Porcine circovirus (PCV), as well as porcine parvovirus (PPV), was detected in tissues by virus reisolation, polymerase chain reaction analysis, or immunohistochemistry. All infected piglets developed moderate to high titers of antibody to PCV and moderate titers to PPV. No lesions, virus, or virus-specific antibodies were detected in sham-inoculated or uninoculated control piglets. These studies demonstrate that the lesions of PMWS can be experimentally reproduced in gnotobiotic piglets using filterable viral agents derived from pigs with PMWS and provide an experimental basis for further investigation into the pathogenesis and control of this emerging infectious disease in swine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104063879901100101

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Ellis, J., Krakowka, S., Lairmore, M., Haines, D., Bratanich, A., Clark, E., Allan, G., Konoby, C., Hassard, L., Meehan, B., Martin, K., Harding, J., Kennedy, S., & McNeilly, F.
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
Published
1999-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
3-14
ISSN
  • 1040-6387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-4936
OpenAlex
W2142205050
Cited by
272
References
1
FWCI
41.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproduction of Lesions of Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome in Gnotobiotic Piglets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/104063879901100101
The paper
Ellis, J., Krakowka, S., Lairmore, M., Haines, D., Bratanich, A., Clark, E., Allan, G., Konoby, C., Hassard, L., Meehan, B., Martin, K., Harding, J., Kennedy, S., & McNeilly, F. (1999). Reproduction of Lesions of Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome in Gnotobiotic Piglets. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063879901100101

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.