The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproduction of Lesions of Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome in Gnotobiotic Piglets
Open accessAbstract
Neonatal gnotobiotic piglets were inoculated with tissue homogenates and low- and high-passage cell culture material to determine if the lesions of the newly described porcine postweaning multi-systemic wasting syndrome (PMWS) could be reproduced. For this, 17 3-day-old gnotobiotic piglets were inoculated intranasally with pelleted chloroform-treated, filtered extracts from cell cultures, filter-sterilized homogenates of lymphoid tissue from PMWS-affected piglets, or control materials. Piglets were maintained in germ-free isolators for up to 5 weeks after infection prior to euthanasia and collection of samples for analysis. All piglets inoculated with the viral inocula developed lesions typical of PMWS, including generalized lymphadenopathy, hepatitis, nephritis, interstitial pneumonia, myocarditis, and gastritis. Porcine circovirus (PCV), as well as porcine parvovirus (PPV), was detected in tissues by virus reisolation, polymerase chain reaction analysis, or immunohistochemistry. All infected piglets developed moderate to high titers of antibody to PCV and moderate titers to PPV. No lesions, virus, or virus-specific antibodies were detected in sham-inoculated or uninoculated control piglets. These studies demonstrate that the lesions of PMWS can be experimentally reproduced in gnotobiotic piglets using filterable viral agents derived from pigs with PMWS and provide an experimental basis for further investigation into the pathogenesis and control of this emerging infectious disease in swine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Variation in cellular tropism between isolates of equine herpesvirus-1 in foals.
Patel, J. R., Edington, N., & Mumford, J. A. (1982) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/bf01320781 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Porcine Circovirus Type 2 (PCV2): Pathogenesis and Interaction with the Immune System
Meng, X.-J. (2013) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103720 · Cited by 310
Kennedy, S., Moffett, D., McNeilly, F., Meehan, B., Ellis, J., Krakowka, S., & Allan, G. (2000) · Journal of Comparative Pathology · doi:10.1053/jcpa.1999.0337 · Cited by 290
Self-citationKrakowka, S., Ellis, J. A., McNeilly, F., Ringler, S., Rings, D. M., & Allan, G. (2001) · Veterinary Pathology · doi:10.1354/vp.38-1-31 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ellis, J., Krakowka, S., Lairmore, M., Haines, D., Bratanich, A., Clark, E., Allan, G., Konoby, C., Hassard, L., Meehan, B., Martin, K., Harding, J., Kennedy, S., & McNeilly, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-14
- ISSN
- 1040-6387 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-4936
- OpenAlex
- W2142205050
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 41.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproduction of Lesions of Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome in Gnotobiotic Piglets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/104063879901100101
- The paper
- Ellis, J., Krakowka, S., Lairmore, M., Haines, D., Bratanich, A., Clark, E., Allan, G., Konoby, C., Hassard, L., Meehan, B., Martin, K., Harding, J., Kennedy, S., & McNeilly, F. (1999). Reproduction of Lesions of Postweaning Multisystemic Wasting Syndrome in Gnotobiotic Piglets. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063879901100101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.