Cited by 41

Managing HR in the Small and Medium Enterprise: The Impact of Professional Employer Organizations

Klaas, Brian S., Mcclendon, John, Gainey, Thomas W.·2000·Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice

Abstract

Due to their limited size, many small and medium enterprises (SMEs) cannot justify full-time HR professionals in their organizations. Thus, the complex and time-consuming nature of many HR activities can result in a significant drain on existing managerial resources. Professional employer organizations (PEOs), however, offer SMEs an alternative for handling their workforce by providing compensation programs, regulatory compliance, and other HR-related services. This study examines the satisfaction levels of 763 customers of one large PEO. Results show that firm growth, past HR problems, workforce size, contractual detail, service representative-client relations, value congruence, and overall PEO usage are significantly related to managerial satisfaction with PEO services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104225870002500109

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Klaas, B. S., Mcclendon, J., & Gainey, T. W.
Affiliations
  • Darla Moore School of Business at the University of South Carolina.
  • School of Business Management at Temple University.
  • Richards College of Business at State University of West Georgia.
Venue
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice
Published
2000-10
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
107-124
ISSN
  • 1042-2587
  • 1540-6520
Cited by
41
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review