Regulation, Pluralism, and Religious Market Structure: Explaining Religion's Vitality
Abstract
At the macro level, the economics of religion implies that religion will be more vibrant where it is less regulated and hence more competitive. Recent attempts to support this hypothesis are weakened by the use of religious pluralism as a proxy measure for the extent to which the religious market is subsidized or regulated. This article extends the analysis of religious market structure by measuring directly the regulation of religious markets in 18 Western democracies. The analysis provides strong support for the hypothesized connection between religious competitiveness and vitality. The results show that (a) the relationship between subsidized religion and religious participation holds in both Protestant and Catholic countries and (b) its explanatory power is far superior to that of religious pluralism alone. However, certain features of the results suggest that the “economics of religion” should be supplemented with noneconomic variables to achieve adequate sociological explanation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The level of state regulation should be taken as an independent variable that shapes the structure of the religious market and hence religious behaviors.
“The implication of Yang's triple-market theory is that the level of state regulation should be taken as an independent variable that shapes the structure of the religious market and hence religious behaviors (see also Finke 1990; Chaves and Cann 1992).”
From Catholicism and Its Civic Engagement (2014) · cites this paper as Chaves and Cann 1992
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795 · see citing works
Religion and Political Economy in an International Panel
McCLEARY, R. M., & BARRO, R. J. (2006) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5906.2006.00299.x · Cited by 416 · see citing works
MINKENBERG, M. (2002) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414002035002004 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Catholicism and Its Civic Engagement
Hao, Z., Kuo, W.-B., Chan, S. H., Jing, M., & Tam, Y. F. (2014) · Review of Religion and Chinese Society · doi:10.1163/22143955-04102005 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- CHAVES, M., & CANN, D. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Notre Dame (US)
- Loyola University Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- CHAVES, MARK
- Venue
- Rationality and Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 272-290
- ISSN
- 1043-4631 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7358
- OpenAlex
- W2021458120
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Rationality and Society (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
- Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
- Social Sciences › Education › Religious Education and Schools
- Keywords
- religious regulation, religious pluralism, religious vitality, religious participation, Catholic countries, Western democracies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review