Cited by 1,644

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EXPLAINING EDUCATIONAL DIFFERENTIALS: TOWARDS A FORMAL RATIONAL ACTION THEORY

Breen, Richard, Goldthorpe, John H.·1997·Rationality and Society

Abstract

In this paper we seek to provide an explanation of three widely documented empirical phenomena. These are: (i) increasing educational participation rates; (ii) little change in class differentials in these rates; and (iii) a recent and very rapid erosion of gender differentials in educational attainment levels. We develop a formal mathematical model, using a rational action approach and drawing on earlier work that seeks to explain these three trends as the product of individual decisions made in the light of the resources available to, and the constraints facing, individual pupils and their families. The model represents children and their families as acting rationally, i.e. as choosing among the different educational options available to them on the basis of evaluations of their costs and benefits and of the perceived probabilities of more or less successful outcomes. It then accounts for stability, or change, in the educational differentials that ensue by reference to a quite limited range of situational features. So, both class and gender differences in patterns of educational decisions are explained as the consequence of differences in resources and constraints. We do not, therefore, invoke `cultural' or `normative' differences between classes or genders to account for why they differ in their typical educational decisions (though we have something to say about the role of norms in such an account). Because the model is presented mathematically, testable corollaries are easy to derive as are other implications of our model for patterns of relevant behaviour.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104346397009003002

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Arum, R., European University Institute, School-to-Work Conference
  2. Blossfeld, H.-P., Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries
  3. Boudon, R., Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality
  4. De Graaf, P.M., Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries
  5. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.esr.a036507 · DOI
  6. Durut-Bellat, M., De l'Orientation en Fin de Cinquième au Fonctionnement du Collège
  7. 10.1017/S0003975600006172 · DOI
  8. Erikson, R., Can Education be Equalised? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective
  9. Erikson, R., Ursprung och Utbildning
  10. Erikson, R., Can Education be Equalised? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective
  11. Erikson, R., Can Education be Equalised? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective
  12. 10.2307/591365 · DOI
  13. Goldthorpe, J.H., The Social Grading of Occupations
  14. Hout, M., Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries
  15. Jonsson, J.O., Can Education be Equalised? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective
  16. 10.2307/2554492 · DOI
  17. Müller, W., 1994, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 46, 1
  18. Popper, K.R., Objective Knowledge
  19. Raftery, A.E., `Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion, Reform and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-1975.'
  20. Sewell, W.H., Schooling and Achievement in American Society
  21. Shavit, Y., Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries
  22. Wadsworth, M.E.J., The Impact of Time: Childhood, History and Adult Life

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,644

Metadata

Authors
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H.
Venue
Rationality and Society
Published
1997-08
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
275-305
ISSN
  • 1043-4631
  • 1461-7358
Cited by
1,644
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EXPLAINING EDUCATIONAL DIFFERENTIALS: TOWARDS A FORMAL RATIONAL ACTION THEORY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/104346397009003002
The paper
Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). EXPLAINING EDUCATIONAL DIFFERENTIALS: TOWARDS A FORMAL RATIONAL ACTION THEORY. Rationality and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346397009003002