CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 185Aging and Gerontology ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

"Successful Aging:": A Disability Perspective

Minkler, Meredith, Fadem, Pamela·2002·Journal of Disability Policy Studies
DOI 10.1177/104420730201200402
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article examines the "successful aging" paradigm in gerontology and the problems it poses when applied to the growing population of people who are aging with substantial physical disabilities. We review Rowe and Kahn's (1998) three characteristics of successful aging-low probability of disease and disease-related disability, high cognitive and physical functioning, and active engagement with life-and explore their relevance and limitations when applied to people with disabilities. We demonstrate how both the term successful aging and its specific dimensions can serve to further stigmatize and marginalize people who, by virtue of their disabilities, may not meet narrowly defined criteria for "aging well." The article concludes by arguing for models that accent a broader ecological approach, one that stresses environmental accommodations and policy changes, and acknowledges that gains as well as losses are a critical part of the aging process. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/104420730201200402

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Bleecker, T., 2000, Consumer Choice, 4, 1
  2. Brown, A., 1999, Newsletter
  3. Carstensen, L. ( 1991 ). Selectivity theory: Social activity. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (pp. 195-217) New York: Springer.
  4. Cassel C.K. & Neugarten, B. (1991). The goals of medicine in an aging society. In R. Binstock & S. Post (Eds.), Too old for health care? (pp. 75-91). Baltimore : Johns Hopkins.
  5. Cole, T., 1988, Tikkun, 3, 14
  6. Cole, T., 1992, The journey of life: A cultural history of aging in America. Cambridge, UK
  7. Fadem, P.S., Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Gerontological Society of America
  8. Harper, S. (1997). Constructing later life/constructing the body: Some thoughts from feminist theory. In A. Jamieson, S. Harper, & C. Victor (Eds.), Critical approaches to ageing and later life (pp. 160-172). Buckingham: Open University Press.
  9. Holstein, M. (1998). Women and aging: Troubling implications. In M. Minkler & C. L. Estes (Eds.), Critical gerontology (pp. 359-373). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
  10. Kaye, H.S., 1998, Disability Statistics Abstract, 21, 1
  11. LeBlanc, L.A., 1997, Journal of Clinical Geropsychology, 3, 37
  12. Leitman, R., 1994, N.O.D. Harris survey of Americans with disabilities
  13. Marsiske, M., Lang, F.R., Baltes, P.B. & Baltes, M.M. (1995). Selective optimization and compensation: Life-span perspectives on successful . human development. In R. A. Dixon & L. Blackman (Eds.), Psychological compensation: Managing losses and promoting gains (pp. 35-79). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  14. Seeman, T.E. ( 1994). Successful aging: Reconceptualizing the aging process from a more positive perspective. In B. Vellas & J. Albarede (Eds.), Facts and research in gerontology (pp. 61-73). New York: Springer.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–183 of 183

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Minkler, M., & Fadem, P.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
ORCID
Minkler, Meredith
Venue
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-03
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
229-235
ISSN
  • 1044-2073 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4802
DOI
10.1177/104420730201200402
OpenAlex
W2160586522
Cited by
185
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Disability Policy Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
successful aging, aging with disability, physical disability, stigmatization, marginalization, ecological approach, disability policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review