Cited by 852Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyGender Diversity and Inequality

Ethnic Diversity and Creativity in Small Groups

Open access
McLeod, Poppy Lauretta, Lobel, Sharon Alisa, Cox, Taylor H.·1996·Small Group Research

Abstract

There is a growing belief among managers that ethnic diversity, when well managed, can provide organizations with certain competitive advantages. But the belief in this value-inl diversity hypothesis rests largely on anecdotal rather than empirical evidence. Results are reported ofa controlled experimental study that compares the performance on a brainstorm ing task between groups composed of all Anglo-Americans with groups composed ofAnglo-, Asian, African, and Hispanic Americans. The particular brainstorming task used-The Tourist Problem-was chosenfor its relevancefordiversity along the dimension of ethnicity. The ideas produced by the ethnically diverse groups were judged to be of higher quality-more effective andfeasible-than the ideas produced by the homogeneous groups. Members of homogeneous groups reported marginally more attraction to their groups than did members of diverse oroups. Directions for future research with respect to the degree of diversity, the nature of the task, and group process are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1046496496272003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Adler, N. J. (1986). International dimensions of organizational behavior. Boston: PWS-Kent. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strate gic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
  2. Bell, E. L. (1990). The bicultural life experience of career-oriented black women. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 459-477.
  3. Bond, M. H., & Yang, K. S. (1982). Ethnic affirmation versus cross- cultural accommodation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 169-185.
  4. Bontempo, R., Lobel, S. A., & Triandis, H. C. (1990). Compliance and value internalization in Brazil and the U.S.: Effects of allocentrism and anonymity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 200-213.
  5. Bouchard, T. J., & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 51-55.
  6. Cox, T., Jr., Lobel, S. A., & McLeod, P. L. (1991). Effects of ethnic groups' cultural differences on cooperative and competitive behavior on a group task. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 827-847.
  7. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
  8. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in idea-generating groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392-403.
  9. Gallupe, R. B., Dennis, A. R., Cooper, W. H., Valacich, J. S., Bastianutti, L. M., & Nunamaker, J. F. (1992). Electronic brainstorming and group size. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 350-369.
  10. Garza, R. T., Romero, L. G., Cox, B., & Ramirez, M. (1982). Biculturalism, locus of control and leader behavior in ethnically mixed small groups. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 12, 237-253.
  11. Graham, W. K., & Dillon, P. C. (1974). Creative supergroups: Group performance as a function of individual performance on brainstorming tasks. The Journal of Social Psychology, 93, 101-105.
  12. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401-407.
  13. Jackson, S. E. (1992). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse workforce. In S. Worchel, W. Wood, & J. Simpson (Eds.), Group process and productivity (pp. 138-173). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  14. Jackson, S. E., Brett, J. F., Sessa V. I., & Cooper, D. M. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Interpersonal dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotion and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-679.
  15. Johnston, W. B. (1991). Global workforce 2000: The new world labor market. Harvard Business Review, 69(2), 115-127.
  16. Kanter, R. (1968, February). Creating the creative environment. Management Review, 11-12.
  17. Kerwin, R. (1983). Brainstorming as a flexible management tool. Personnel Journal, 62, 414.
  18. King, N., & Anderson, N. (1990). Innovation in working groups. In M. A. West & J. F. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  19. Lambert, W. (1977). The effects of bilingualism on the individual: Cognitive and sociocultural consequences. In P. A. Hurnbey (Ed.), Bilingualism: Psychological, social and educational implications (pp. 15-27). New York: Academic Press.
  20. Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
  21. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  22. McLeod, P. L., Liker, J. K., & Lobel, S. A. (1992). Process feedback in task groups: An application of goal setting. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 28, 15-41.
  23. Moscovici, S. (1985). Innovation and minority influence. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Avermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 19-59). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  24. Murray, A. I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. Strate gic Management Journal, 10, 125-141.
  25. Nystrom, H. (1979). Creativity and innovation. New York: Wiley.
  26. Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. (1966). Scientists in organizations. New York: Wiley.
  27. Thomas, R. R. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 107-117.
  28. Tse, D. K., Lee, K. H., Vertinsky, I., & Wehrung, D. A. (1988). Does culture matter? A cross-cultural study of executives' choice, decisiveness, and risk adjustment in international marketing. Journal of Marketing, 5, 81-95.
  29. Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
  30. Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 74-92.
  31. Walker, B. A., & Hanson, W. C. (1992). Valuing differences at Digital Equipment Corporation. In S. E. Jackson (Ed.), Diversity in the workplace: Human resources initiatives (pp. 119-137). New York: Guilford.
  32. Watson, W. E., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
  33. Zenger, T. R., & Lawrence, B. S. (1989). Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 353-376.
  34. Ziller, R. C., Behringer, R. D., & Goodchilds, J. E. (1962). Group creativity under conditions of success or failure and variations in groups' stability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46,43-49.
  35. Sharon Alisa Lobel is Associate Professor of Management at Seattle University. She is Associate Editor of Human Resource Management and is a member of the editorial board of Academy of Management Journal. Her research focuses on the many aspects of managing diversity in organizations and has appeared in Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, Organizational Dynamics, and elsewhere. She was a guest editor for a special issue on work and family prepared for Human Resource Management. With Ellen E. Kossek, she edited the book Human Resource Strategies for Managing Diversity, which will be published by Blackwell in 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • Seattle University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Small Group Research
Published
1996-05
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
248-264
ISSN
  • 1046-4964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8278
OpenAlex
W1964793238
Cited by
852
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 37
FWCI
9.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Small Group Research (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Diversity and Inequality
Keywords
ethnic diversity, creativity, small groups, brainstorming, group performance, idea quality, group attraction, group composition, Asian Americans, African Americans, Hispanic Americans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review