Cited by 393Educational Games and GamificationInnovative Teaching Methodologies in Social SciencesSimulation and Modeling Applications

Toward a Taxonomy Linking Game Attributes to Learning: An Empirical Study

Open access
Bedwell, Wendy L., Pavlas, Davin, Heyne, Kyle, Lazzara, Elizabeth H., Salas, Eduardo·2012·Simulation & Gaming

Abstract

The serious games community is moving toward research focusing on direct comparisons between learning outcomes of serious games and those of more traditional training methods. Such comparisons are difficult, however, due to the lack of a consistent taxonomy of game attributes for serious games. Without a clear understanding of what truly constitutes a game, scientific inquiry will continue to reveal inconsistent findings, making it hard to provide practitioners with guidance as to the most important attribute(s) for desired training outcomes. This article presents a game attribute taxonomy derived from a comprehensive literature review and subsequent card sorts performed by subject matter experts (SMEs). The categories of serious game attributes that emerged represent the shared mental models of game SMEs and serve to provide a comprehensive collection of game attributes. In order to guide future serious games research, the existing literature base is organized around the framework of this taxonomy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1046878112439444

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bedwell et al. (2012) found positive effects of the inclusion of game fiction on knowledge and motivation in their review.

    “Whereas Bedwell et al. (2012) found positive effects of the inclusion of game fiction on knowledge and motivation in their review, meta-analyses by others such as Wouters et al. (2013) found that serious games with narrative elements are not more effective than serious games without narrative elements.”

    From The gamification of learning: a meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Bedwell et al. 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 393

Authors
Bedwell, W. L., Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Lazzara, E. H., & Salas, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Central Florida, Orlando, USA
Venue
Simulation & Gaming
Published
2012-05-14
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
729-760
ISSN
  • 1046-8781 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-826X
OpenAlex
W1969014122
Cited by
393
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
27.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Simulation & Gaming (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Central Florida
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
Keywords
serious games, game attributes, serious game design, card sorting, domain experts, shared mental models, training outcomes, game-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review