The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multilingual Translation Issues in Qualitative Research: Reflections on a Metaphorical Process
Abstract
Focus on the translation and validation of measurement instruments has left a gap in the discussion on how to construct multilingual qualitative tools, such as interviews. Traditional methods of forward and backward translation have been criticized for weak conceptual equivalence, a crucial issue when multiple language interview methods are used.Through a creative arts metaphor of weaving, the authors describe an alternative process of multicentric translation used in the development of an interview guide designed to explore the impact of transition on palliative care patients in six European countries. Four identified core constructs illuminate this multicentric process: Cohesion, Congruence, Clarity, and Courtesy. Mutual reciprocity between researcher and translator offers greater possibility for construction of nuance and meaning, particularly where cultural parameters influence the collection and meaning of sensitive data from vulnerable populations. The translator therefore becomes a collaborator in the research process, which strengthens the rigor of language-based inquiry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy
van Manen, M. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,308
Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2012) · Cited by 5,975
(1986) · Cited by 3,447
The problem of rigor in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1986) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005 · Cited by 2,772 · cited 1×
“The dilemma of conceptual equivalence across language reflects the inherent nontransferability of descriptors of rigor across paradigms (Cutcliffe & McKenna, 1999; Morse, 1999; Sandelowski, 1986; Tobin & Begley, 2004).”
Background(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41sup-0018 · Cited by 2,665
Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative
Mishler, E. G. (1986) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674041141 · Cited by 2,028
Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework
Tobin, G. A., & Begley, C. M. (2004) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x · Cited by 1,601
Collecting data using a semi‐structured interview: a discussion paper
Louise Barriball, K., & While, A. (1994) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01088.x · Cited by 1,464
Qualitative Research and Translation Dilemmas
Temple, B., & Young, A. (2004) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794104044430 · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Developing multiple language versions of instruments for intercultural research
Erkut, S. (2010) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00111.x · Cited by 241
Hesselink, G., Flink, M., Olsson, M., Barach, P., Dudzik-Urbaniak, E., Orrego, C., Toccafondi, G., Kalkman, C., Johnson, J. K., Schoonhoven, L., et al. (2012) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001165 · Cited by 203
Dopelt, K., Davidovitch, N., Davidov, N., Plot, I., Boas, H., & Barach, P. (2024) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04241-9 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Larkin, P. J., Dierckx de Casterlé, B., & Schotsmans, P.
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 468-476
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2170974461
- Cited by
- 266
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 75.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multilingual Translation Issues in Qualitative Research: Reflections on a Metaphorical Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1049732307299258
- The paper
- Larkin, P. J., Dierckx de Casterlé, B., & Schotsmans, P. (2007). Multilingual Translation Issues in Qualitative Research: Reflections on a Metaphorical Process. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307299258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.