Toward Caring for Oneself in a Life of Intense Ups and Downs: A Reflexive-Collaborative Exploration of Recovery in Bipolar Disorder
Abstract
In this article, we discuss processes of recovery in bipolar disorder. We utilized a hermeneutical-phenomenological approach developed within a reflexive-collaborative framework to examine what individuals do to promote improvement and positive change in their own lives. The study was designed and carried out in collaboration with an expert-by-experience group of 12 coresearchers with firsthand experiences of mental distress and recovery. In-depth interviews were conducted with 13 participants who acknowledged having lived and dealt with a bipolar disorder. Four core themes were drawn from our analysis: (a) handling ambivalence about letting go of manic states; (b) finding something to hang on to when the world is spinning around; (c) becoming aware of signals from self and others; and (d) finding ways of caring for oneself. Interrelationships between the four themes, along with limitations, strengths, and implications of the study are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Veseth, M., Binder, P.-E., Borg, M., & Davidson, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-06-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 119-133
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- OpenAlex
- W2170451480
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
- Keywords
- bipolar disorder, recovery, self-care, manic episodes, ambivalence, expert by experience, lived experience, psychological distress, self-awareness, social support
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Bipolar Disorder, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Self Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review