Men and Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Miscarriage is common, affecting one in five pregnancies, but the psychosocial effects often go unrecognized and unsupported. The effects on men may be subject to unintentional neglect by health care practitioners, who typically focus on biological symptoms, confined to women. Therefore, we set out to systematically review the evidence of lived experiences of male partners in high-income countries. Our search and thematic synthesis of the relevant literature identified 27 manuscripts reporting 22 studies with qualitative methods. The studies collected data from 231 male participants, and revealed the powerful effect of identities assumed and performed by men or constructed for them in the context of miscarriage. We identified perceptions of female precedence, uncertain transition to parenthood, gendered coping responses, and ambiguous relations with health care practitioners. Men were often cast into roles that seemed secondary to others, with limited opportunities to articulate and address any emotions and uncertainties engendered by loss.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recently, three reviews were published in areas relating to men's experiences of pregnancy/neonatal loss; two were scoping reviews rather than systematic, and the other thematically synthesised only qualitative studies on men's lived experiences of miscarriage.
“Recently, three reviews were published in areas relating to men’s experiences of pregnancy/neonatal loss. However, two of these were scoping reviews rather than systematic [48, 49], and the other thematically synthesised only qualitative studies on men’s lived experiences of miscarriage [50].”
From Men’s grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model (2020) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2013). 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research (Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13). Author. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?type=supplementary&id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0180127.s002 · DOI
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012). Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Diagnosis and initial management. London. 31393678
- Authors
- Williams, H. M., Topping, A., Coomarasamy, A., & Jones, L. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Helen M.
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-09-16
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-145
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- PMC
- PMC7322941
- OpenAlex
- W2974725098
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Tommy’s Baby Charity (Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
- Keywords
- miscarriage, male partners, lived experience, psychosocial impact, gender roles, transition to parenthood, emotional uncertainty
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Professional-Family Relations, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review