Cited by 74Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthGender Roles and Identity StudiesFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Men and Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis

Open access
Williams, Helen M., Topping, Annie, Coomarasamy, Arri, Jones, Laura L.·2020·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Miscarriage is common, affecting one in five pregnancies, but the psychosocial effects often go unrecognized and unsupported. The effects on men may be subject to unintentional neglect by health care practitioners, who typically focus on biological symptoms, confined to women. Therefore, we set out to systematically review the evidence of lived experiences of male partners in high-income countries. Our search and thematic synthesis of the relevant literature identified 27 manuscripts reporting 22 studies with qualitative methods. The studies collected data from 231 male participants, and revealed the powerful effect of identities assumed and performed by men or constructed for them in the context of miscarriage. We identified perceptions of female precedence, uncertain transition to parenthood, gendered coping responses, and ambiguous relations with health care practitioners. Men were often cast into roles that seemed secondary to others, with limited opportunities to articulate and address any emotions and uncertainties engendered by loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732319870270

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, three reviews were published in areas relating to men's experiences of pregnancy/neonatal loss; two were scoping reviews rather than systematic, and the other thematically synthesised only qualitative studies on men's lived experiences of miscarriage.

    “Recently, three reviews were published in areas relating to men’s experiences of pregnancy/neonatal loss. However, two of these were scoping reviews rather than systematic [48, 49], and the other thematically synthesised only qualitative studies on men’s lived experiences of miscarriage [50].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 74

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (2013). 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research (Qualitative Research Checklist 31.05.13). Author. Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?type=supplementary&id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0180127.s002 · DOI
  2. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2012). Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Diagnosis and initial management. London. 31393678

Authors
Williams, H. M., Topping, A., Coomarasamy, A., & Jones, L. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Williams, Helen M.
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2019-09-16
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
133-145
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
OpenAlex
W2974725098
Cited by
74
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Tommy’s Baby Charity (Tommy’s National Centre for Miscarriage Research)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
miscarriage, male partners, lived experience, psychosocial impact, gender roles, transition to parenthood, emotional uncertainty
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adaptation, Psychological, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Professional-Family Relations, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review