Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Confused About Theoretical Sampling? Engaging Theoretical Sampling in Diverse Grounded Theory Studies

Conlon, Catherine, Timonen, Virpi, Elliott-O’Dare, Catherine, O’Keeffe, Sorcha, Foley, Geraldine·2020·Qualitative Health Research

Abstract

Theoretical sampling is a key procedure for theory building in the grounded theory method. Confusion about how to employ theoretical sampling in grounded theory can exist among researchers who use or who want to use the grounded theory method. We illustrate how we employed theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies and answer key questions about theoretical sampling in grounded theory. We show how theoretical sampling functions in grounded theory and how it differs from sampling for data generation alone. We demonstrate how induction, retroduction, and abduction operate in grounded theory and how memoing drives theoretical sampling in the pursuit of theory. We explicate how theoretical sampling can contextualize data to build concepts and theory. Finally, we show how theoretical sampling in grounded theory operates in secondary analysis to derive theory that goes beyond the original purpose of data collection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732319899139

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Archer M., 1998, Critical realism: Essential readings, 189
  2. 10.4324/9780203879849 · DOI
  3. Birks M., 2015, Grounded theory: A practical guide
  4. Breckenridge J., Jones D. (2009). Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory research. Grounded Theory Review, 2, 113–126. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847/
  5. Bruscaglioni L. (2015). Theorizing in grounded theory and creative abduction. Quality & Quantity, 50, 2009–2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0248-3 · DOI
  6. Bunt S. (2016). Critical realism and grounded theory: Analysing the adoption outcomes for disabled children using the retroduction framework. Qualitative Social Work, 17, 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016664572 · DOI
  7. Butler A. E., Copnell B., Hall H. (2018). The development of theoretical sampling in practice. Collegian, 25, 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.01.002 · DOI
  8. Charmaz K., 2006, Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis
  9. Charmaz K., 2014, Constructing grounded theory
  10. 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.44029-8 · DOI
  11. Clark A. M., Lissel S. L., Davis C. (2008). Complex critical realism: Tenets and application in nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 31, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ANS.0000341421.34457.2a · DOI
  12. Cleary M., Horsfall J., Hayter M. (2014). Data collection and sampling in qualitative research: Does size matter? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 473–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12163 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Conlon C., Carney G., Timonen V., Scharf T. (2015). “Emergent reconstruction” in grounded theory: Learning from team-based interview research. Qualitative Research, 15, 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113495038 · DOI
  14. Conlon C., Timonen V., Carney G., Scharf T. (2014). Women (re)negotiating care across family generations: Intersections of gender and socioeconomic status. Gender & Society, 28, 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243214536466 · DOI
  15. Conlon C., Timonen V., Scharf T., Carney G. (2014). Consumption of care and intergenerational relations in the Irish context. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3, 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674313X13808738507523 · DOI
  16. Corbin J., 2015, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  17. Draucker C. B., Martsolf D. S., Ross R., Rusk T. B. (2007). Theoretical sampling and category development in grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308450 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Elliott O’Dare C., Timonen V., Conlon C. (2019a). Escaping the “old fogey”: Doing old age through intergenerational friendship. Journal of Aging Studies, 48, 67–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.01.004 · DOI
  19. Elliott O’Dare C., Timonen V., Conlon C. (2019b). Intergenerational friendships of older adults: Why do we know so little about them? Ageing & Society, 39, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X17000800 · DOI
  20. Elliott O’Dare C., Canadian Journal of Aging
  21. 10.4135/9781473913882 · DOI
  22. 10.4135/9781529716658 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/1475-6773.12275 · DOI
  24. Foley G., Timonen V., Hardiman O. (2014a). Acceptance and decision making in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from a life-course perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 24, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732313516545 · DOI
  25. Foley G., Timonen V., Hardiman O. (2014b). Exerting control and adapting to loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Social Science & Medicine, 101, 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Foley G., Timonen V., Hardiman O. (2014c). Understanding psycho-social processes underpinning engagement with services in motor neurone disease: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 28, 318–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313512013 · DOI
  27. Foley G., Timonen V., Hardiman O. (2016). “I hate being a burden”: The patient perspective on carer burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration, 17, 351–357. https://doi.org/10.3109/21678421.2016.1143512 · DOI
  28. Glaser B. G., 1978, Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory
  29. Glaser B. G., 1992, Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing
  30. Glaser B. G., 2014, Memoing: A vital grounded theory procedure
  31. Glaser B. G., 2012, The discovery of grounded theory
  32. Lolich L., Riccò I., Deusdad B., Timonen V. (2019). Embracing technology? Health and social care professionals’ attitudes to the deployment of e-Health initiatives in elder care services in Catalonia and Ireland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.012 · DOI
  33. McDonald A., Lolich L., Timonen V., Warters A. (2019). “Time is more important than anything else”: Tensions of time in the home care of older adults in Ireland. International Journal of Care and Caring, 3, 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788219X15622468259858 · DOI
  34. Merriam S. B., 2016, Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation
  35. Morse J. M., 2019, The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory, 145
  36. O’Keeffe S. (2019). Hoping and coping: Understanding the experience of people with malignant glioma [Doctoral dissertation, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin]. http://hdl.handle.net/2262/85987
  37. Oliver C. (2012). Critical realist grounded theory: A new approach for social work research. The British Journal of Social Work, 42, 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr064 · DOI
  38. 10.1002/9780470750841 · DOI
  39. Strauss A., 1990, Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques
  40. Strauss A., 1998, Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
  41. Timmermans S., Tavory I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30, 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Timonen V., Conlon C., Scharf T., Carney G. (2013). Family, state, class and solidarity: Re-conceptualising intergenerational solidarity through the grounded theory approach. European Journal of Ageing, 10, 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-013-0272-x · DOI
  43. Timonen V., Foley G., Conlon C. (2018). Challenges when using grounded theory: A pragmatic introduction to doing GT research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918758086 · DOI
  44. Timonen V., Lolich L. (2019). “The poor carer”: Ambivalent social construction of the home care worker in elder care services. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 62, 728–748. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2019.1640334 · DOI
  45. Whiteside M., Mills J., McCalman J. (2012). Using secondary data for grounded theory analysis. Australian Social Work, 65, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2011.645165 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Conlon, C., Timonen, V., Elliott-O’Dare, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Foley, G.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  • Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Published
2020-01-20
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
947-959
ISSN
  • 1049-7323
  • 1552-7557
Cited by
220
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • Health Research Board (HPF/2011/1)
  • Atlantic Philanthropies (20309)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (769975)
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016S1A3A2924563)
  • Ministry of Education
  • Irish Research Council (GOIPG/2015/3896, GOIPG/2016/525)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review