Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 634

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature

Open access
Vindrola-Padros, Cecilia, Johnson, Ginger A.·2020·Qualitative Health Research
DOI 10.1177/1049732320921835
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Qualitative researchers are under increasing time demands to rapidly collect, analyze, and disseminate the results of their findings. Adaptations to qualitative methods may be required to enable the use of timely and relevant qualitative data across multiple disciplinary settings. The aim of this review is to briefly explore the ways in which data collection and analysis methods have been adapted in qualitative research to deal with short study timeframes. We carried out a two-phased systematic review of the literature and determined there were six primary reasons why rapid techniques were used: (a) reduce time, (b) reduce cost, (c) increase the amount of collected data, (d) improve efficiency, (e) improve accuracy, and (f) obtain a closer approximation to the narrated realities of research participants. In addition, we analyzed the characteristics of the articles, how traditional methods were adapted and evaluated, the benefits and limitations of using rapid techniques, and future recommendations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1049732320921835

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Anderson J. (1998). Transcribing with voice recognition software: A new tool for qualitative researchers. Qualitative Health Research, 8(5), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239800800511 · doi:10.1177/104973239800800511
  2. Beebe J. (1995). Basic concepts and techniques of rapid appraisal. Human Organization, 54(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.54.1.k84tv883mr2756l3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beebe J., 2014, Rapid qualitative inquiry
  4. Bentley M., Pelto G., Straus W., Schumann D., Adegbola C., de la Pena E., Oni G. A., Brown K. H., Huffman S. L. (1988). Rapid ethnographic assessment: Applications in diarrhea management program. Social Science & Medicine, 27(1), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90168-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brown D., Hernández A., Saint-Jean G., Evans S., Tafari I., Brewster L. G., Celestin M. J., Gómez-Estefan C., Regalado F., Akal S., Nierenberg B., Kauschinger E. D., Schwartz R., Page J. B. (2008). A participatory action research pilot study of urban health disparities using rapid assessment response and evaluation. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.091363 · DOI
  6. Burgess-Allen J., Owen-Smith V. (2010). Using mind mapping techniques for rapid qualitative data analysis in public participation processes. Health Expect, 13(4), 406–415. https://doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00594.x · DOI · Paper page
  7. Eaton K., Stritzke W., Ohan J. (2019). Using scribes in qualitative research as an alternative to transcription. The Qualitative Report, 24(3), 586–605. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3473&context=tqr · DOI
  8. Faubion J., 2009, Fieldwork is not what it used to be: Learning anthropology’s method in a time of transition
  9. Gravois T., Rosenfield S., Greenberg B. (1992). Establishing reliability for coding implementation concerns of school-based teams from audiotapes. Evaluation Review, 16(5), 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X9201600507 · doi:10.1177/0193841x9201600507
  10. Greenwood M., Kendrick T., Davies H., Gill F. (2017). Hearing voices: Comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data. Applied Nursing Research, 35, 90–93. https://doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2017.02.024 · DOI
  11. Halcomb E. J., Davidson P. M. (2006). Is verbatim transcription of interview data always necessary? Applied Nursing Research, 19(1), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Handwerker P., 2001, Quick ethnography: A guide to rapid multi-method research
  13. Johnson B. (2011). The speed and accuracy of voice recognition software-assisted transcription versus the listen-and-type method: A research note. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110385966 · doi:10.1177/1468794110385966
  14. Lopez K. D., Febretti A., Stifter J., Johnson A., Wilkie D. J., Keenan G. (2017). Toward a more robust and efficient usability testing method of clinical decision support for nurses derived from nursing electronic health record data. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 28(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/2047-3095.12146 · DOI
  15. Markle T., West R., Rich P. (2011). Beyond transcription: Technology, change and refinement of method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Article 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.3.1564 · DOI
  16. McNall M., Foster-Fishman P. (2007). Methods of rapid evaluation, assessment, and appraisal. American Journal of Evaluation, 28(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214007300895 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Neal J., Neal Z., VanDyke E., Kornbluh M. (2015). Expediting the analysis of qualitative data in evaluation: A procedure for the rapid identification of themes from audio recordings (RITA). American Journal of Evaluation, 36(1), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214014536601 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Park J., Zeanah E. (2005). An evaluation of voice recognition software for use in interview-based research: A research note. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105050837 · DOI
  19. Petro N. (2010). Hate taking notes-try mind mapping. GPSolo, 27(4), 21–23. www.jstor.org/stable/23630192 · doi:10.1038/scientificamericanmind0310-23
  20. Pink S., Morgan J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/symb.66 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Scott D. ’Sharpe H., O’Leary K., Dehaeck U., Hindmarsh K., Moore J. G., Osmond M. H. (2009). Court reporters: A viable solution for the challenges of focus group data collection? Qualitative Health Research, 19(1), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308327883 · DOI
  22. Scrimshaw S. C., Hurtado E. (1988). Anthropological involvement in the Central American diarrheal disease control project. Social Science & Medicine, 27(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(88)90167-0 · DOI
  23. Skillman M., Cross-Barnet C., Friedman S. R., Rotondo C., Ruiz S., Moiduddin A. (2019). A framework for rigorous qualitative research as a component of mixed method rapid-cycle evaluation. Qualitative Health Research, 29(2), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318795675 · DOI
  24. Tattersall C., 2007, Nursing Times, 103, 32
  25. Taylor B., Henshall C., Kenyon S., Litchfield I., Greenfield S. (2018). Can rapid approaches to qualitative analysis deliver timely, valid findings to clinical leaders? A mixed methods study comparing rapid and thematic analysis. BMJ Open, 8(10), Article e019993. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019993 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tessier S. (2012). From field notes to transcripts to tape recordings: Evolution or combination? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100410 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Vindrola-Padros C., Vindrola-Padros B. (2018). Quick and dirty? A systematic review of the use of rapid ethnographies in healthcare organisation and delivery. BMJ Quality & Safety, 27(4), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007226 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Watkins D. (2017). Rapid and rigorous qualitative data analysis: The “RADaR” Technique for applied research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917712131 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 634

Metadata

Authors
Vindrola-Padros, C., & Johnson, G. A.
Venue
Qualitative Health Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2020-07-15
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
1596-1604
ISSN
  • 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7557
DOI
10.1177/1049732320921835
OpenAlex
W3042489844
Cited by
634
References
1
FWCI
76.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1049732320921835
The paper
Vindrola-Padros, C., & Johnson, G. A. (2020). Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320921835

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.