Culturally safe neonatal care: talking with health practitioners identified as champions by indigenous families
Open accessAbstract
The burden of health inequities borne by Indigenous peoples can be overwhelming, especially when mothers and newborns' lives are at stake and health services seem slow to invest in responsiveness. In Aotearoa (New Zealand), urgent action is required to eliminate persistent systemic inequities for Māori (Indigenous) whānau (family collectives that extend beyond the household). This Kaupapa Māori (by Māori, for Māori) qualitative study aimed to explore the views of health practitioners identified as champions by whānau of preterm Māori infants. Ten health practitioners were interviewed and asked about their involvement with the whānau, their role in explanations and communication, and their thoughts on whānau coping. Interview data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. Three superordinate themes were identified: working together in partnership, a problem shared is a problem halved, and sacred space. Collaboration between health practitioners and with whānau was important to the champions and central to their goal of enabling whānau autonomy. This was built on a foundation of connectivity, relationships, and a full appreciation that childbirth is a sacred time that is potentially disrupted when an infant is born prematurely. The values- and relationship-based practices of these champions protected and uplifted whānau. They showed that health practitioners have important roles in both the elimination of inequities and the sustaining of Māori self-determination. This championship is an exemplar of what culturally safe care looks like in day-to-day practice with Māori and is a standard that other health practitioners should be held to.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple qualitative studies have described cultural challenges Māori families experience in Aotearoa New Zealand NICUs, often related to differences in cultural values.
“Multiple qualitative studies [24 -26], including our own [13], have described some of the cultural challenges M ¯ aori families have experienced in Aotearoa New Zealand NICUs, often related to differences in cultural values.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 8
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Foster P. (2017). Champions of cultural safety: An exploration of how cultural safety can be implemented as a routine aspect of health care (Thesis, Master of Science in Nursing (MSN)). University of British Columbia. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0349177
- PMMRC. (2021). Fourteenth annual report of the perinatal and maternal mortality Review committee | Te pūrongo ā-tau tekau mā whā o te komiti arotake mate pēpi, mate whaea hoki: Reporting mortality and morbidity 2018 | Te tuku pūrongo mō te mate me te whakamate 2018. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/PMMRC/Publications/14thPMMRCreport/report-pmmrc-14th.pdf
- PMMRC. (2022). Fifteenth annual report of the perinatal and maternal mortality Review committee: Reporting mortality and morbidity 2020. https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/assets/Our-work/Mortality-review-committee/PMMRC/Publications-resources/15thPMMRC-report-final.pdf
- Thompson K. (2009). Māori whānau experiences of a neonatal intensive care unit: Waikato hospital (Thesis, Master of Social Sciences (MSocSc)). Waikato Hospital University of Waikato. https://hdl.handle.net/10289/3587
- Authors
- Adcock, A., Cram, F., Edmonds, L., & Lawton, B.
- Affiliations
- Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
- Katoa Ltd., Auckland City, Auckland, New Zealand
- Dunedin Public Hospital (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Adcock, Anna
- Venue
- Qualitative Health Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-03-23
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 531-542
- ISSN
- 1049-7323 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7557
- PMC
- PMC10203996
- OpenAlex
- W4360599573
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Qualitative Health Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Health Research Council of New Zealand (16/444)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Keywords
- culturally safe care, neonatal care, Māori, Indigenous health inequities, preterm infants, whānau, Māori self-determination, sacred space, childbirth, health communication, New Zealand
- MeSH terms
- Indigenous Peoples, Maori People, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, New Zealand, Pregnancy, Culturally Competent Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review