Cited by 13Focus Groups and Qualitative MethodsManagement and Marketing EducationInnovative Teaching Methods

Using Focused Conversation in the Classroom

Spee, James C.·2005·Journal of Management Education

Abstract

Focused conversation is a method of collecting observations, emotions, interpretations, and decisions from groups that have shared a significant experience. This article reports how the author used focused conversation to discuss the events of September 11 with students in three sections of a master’s-level organizational change class in the week following the Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. It discusses ways of using focused conversation in the classroom and in the workplace in a wide range of applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1052562905277969

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spee, J. C.
Affiliations
University of Redlands (US)
Corresponding author
Spee, James C.
Venue
Journal of Management Education
Published
2005-12
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
833-851
ISSN
  • 1052-5629 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6658
OpenAlex
W2167948203
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Organizational Behavior Teaching Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Management and Marketing Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
September 11 attacks, classroom discussion, organizational change, group decision making, collective experience, workplace applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review