Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quality Management in U.S. High Schools: Evidence from the Field ,

Detert, James R., Kopel, Michelle E. Bauerly, Mauriel, John J., Jenni, Roger W.·2000·Journal of School Leadership

Abstract

This article reports on the first stages of a longitudinal study examining the implementation of a reform effort in high schools known as Quality Management (QM). Quality Management is defined as the use of the following seven practices: continuous improvement, customer focus, systems thinking, leadership, studying and evaluating processes, data-based decision making, and training. Interview and survey data from a national sample of purposively chosen high schools show limited results in terms of the effective use and institutionalization of the seven Quality practices by classroom teachers, though the lessons learned and examples of best practices are instructive. Contextual factors that aid or inhibit the implementation QM practices are identified and explicated. The findings provide insight into the implementation of systemic school reform efforts, with particular emphasis on the critical leadership role of principals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/105268460001000203

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. Aguayo R., 1990, Dr. Deming: The American who taught the Japanese about quality.
  2. Arcaro J. S., 1995, Quality in education: An implementation handbook.
  3. Beer M., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 158
  4. Brandt R., 1993, Educational Leadership, 51, 8
  5. Darling-Hammond L., 1993, Phi Delta Kappan, 753
  6. Deming W. E., 1986, Out of the crisis.
  7. Deming W. E., 1993, The new economics for industry, government, education.
  8. 10.2307/258557 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Elmore R. F., 1990, Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform, 1
  10. Fullan M. G., 1991, The new meaning of educational change
  11. Glasser W., 1991, Quality Outcomes-Driven Education, 57
  12. Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies of qualitative research.
  13. Glickman C. D., 1993, Renewing America's schools: A guide for school-based action.
  14. Gross N., 1971, Implementing organizational innovations: A sociological analysis of planned educational change.
  15. 10.2307/2393640 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Harrington-Lueker D., 1998, American School Board Journal, 17
  17. Hess Frederick M., 1999, Spinning wheels: The politics of urban school reform.
  18. Jason M., 1998, Creating high functioning schools: Practice and research
  19. Jenkins L., 1997, Improving student learning: Applying Deming's quality principles in classrooms.
  20. 10.2307/2392366 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Jick T., 1993, Managing change: Cases and concepts, 192
  22. Kanter R. M., 1992, The challenge of organizational change.
  23. Latham G., 1988, Principal, 68, 41
  24. Lieberman A., 1995, The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up
  25. 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Louis K. S., 1990, Improving the urban high school: What works and why.
  27. Merriam S. B., 1988, Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.
  28. Miles M. B., 1984, Qualitative data analysis.
  29. Muncey D. E., 1993, Phi Delta Kappan, 486
  30. National Institute of Standards and Technology., 1995, Education pilot criteria 1995: Malcolm Baldrige national quality award.
  31. National Institute of Standards and Technology., 1997, Award criteria 1997: Malcolm Baldrige national quality award.
  32. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1999, Award criteria 1999: Malcolm Baldrige national quality award.
  33. Neufeld B., 1983, Review of effective schools programs: Implications for policy, practice and research.
  34. Powgrow S., 1996, Phi Delta Kappan, 656
  35. QSR Pty Ltd., 1996, User's guide for QSR NUD-IST: Qualitative data analysis software for research professionals.
  36. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01421.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sarason S. B., 1982, The culture of the school and the problem of change.
  38. Sarason S. B., 1990, The predictable failure of educational reform: Can we change course before it's too late?
  39. Schaffer R. H., 1992, Harvard Business Review, 80
  40. Schenkat R., 1993, Quality connections: Transforming schools through quality management.
  41. Schmoker M., 1996, Results: The key to continuous school improvement.
  42. Schultz L. E., 1994, Profiles in Quality: Learning from the masters.
  43. Silverzweig S., 1976, Sloan Management Review, 17, 33
  44. 10.1108/09534819410056087 · doi:10.1108/09534819410056087
  45. Steinberg L., 1996, Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do.
  46. Tyack D., 1995, Learning from the past: What history teaches us about school reform.
  47. Tyack D., 1995, Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform.
  48. Tye K. A., 1992, Phi Delta Kappan, 8
  49. Wiggins G., 1994, The Executive Educator, 16, 14
  50. Yin R. K., 1994, Case study research: Design and methods

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Detert, J. R., Kopel, M. E. B., Mauriel, J. J., & Jenni, R. W.
Venue
Journal of School Leadership
Published
2000-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
158-187
ISSN
1052-6846
Cited by
15
References
0
Language
en
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.