How Critical is Service-Learning Implementation?
Abstract
Background: Service-learning is a pedagogical approach to teaching designed to create space for students to reflect critically on community service within an academic course of study with the aim of developing socially minded and actively engaged citizens. Purpose: As service-learning has moved away from the margins of educational practice, its potential as a high-impact practice has become increasingly well documented. This documentation speaks only to the theoretical potential of service-learning and does little to consider its practical impact on students and the communities with which they are asked to engage. Methodology/Approach: We conducted an exploratory mixed-methods study to examine the impact of the implementation of service-learning pedagogy in classrooms on students’ civic attitudes. Findings/Conclusions: Results show that endorsement of some key components of service-learning pedagogy on course syllabi are associated with increased changes in students’ reported civic attitudes, suggesting that implementation of pedagogy plays an important role in student experience and learning outcomes. Implications: These findings point to important differences in student outcomes between traditional and critical service-learning pedagogy implementation and point to the challenges inherent in shifting to implementation of critical pedagogy within a hierarchical structure of higher education.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Through structured reflections, students can have more meaningful dialogue, a deeper understanding of their community engagement, and profound personal growth.
“Particularly, through structured reflections, students can have more meaningful dialogue, a deeper understanding of their community engagement, and profound personal growth [35].”
From Beyond the Classroom: Integrating the ORID Model for In-Depth Reflection and Assessment in Service-Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Reflection can serve as a powerful tool for evaluating both the depth of student learning and the effectiveness of teaching practices.
“Reflection can serve as a powerful tool for evaluating both the depth of student learning and the effectiveness of teaching practices [25,35].”
From Beyond the Classroom: Integrating the ORID Model for In-Depth Reflection and Assessment in Service-Learning (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Cites
Guidelines for establishing reliability when coding narrative data
Syed, M., & Nelson, S. C. (2015) · Emerging Adulthood · doi:10.1177/2167696815587648 · Cited by 801 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kayan Fadlelmula, F., & Qadhi, S. M. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090987 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shea, L.-M., Harkins, D., Ray, S., & Grenier, L. I.
- Affiliations
- Suffolk University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shea, Lynne-Marie
- Venue
- Journal of Experiential Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-09-16
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-214
- ISSN
- 1053-8259 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-009X
- OpenAlex
- W4296184339
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 8.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Experiential Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
- Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
- Keywords
- service-learning, critical service-learning, civic attitudes, course syllabus, high-impact practices, student engagement, community service, higher education, critical pedagogy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review