Continuum damage–healing mechanics with application to self-healing composites
Open accessAbstract
The general behavior of self-healing materials is modeled including both irreversible and healing processes. A constitutive model, based on a continuum thermodynamic framework, is proposed to predict the general response of self-healing materials. The self-healing materials’ response produces a reduction in size of microcracks and voids, opposite to damage. The constitutive model, developed in the mesoscale, is based on the proposed Continuum Damage-Healing Mechanics (CDHM) cast in a consistent thermodynamic framework that automatically satisfies the thermodynamic restrictions. The degradation and healing evolution variables are obtained introducing proper dissipation potentials, which are motivated by physically based assumptions. An efficient three-step operator slip algorithm, including healing variables, is discussed in order to accurately integrate the coupled elastoplastic-damage-healing constitutive equations. Material parameters are identified by means of simple and effective analytical procedures. Results are shown in order to demonstrate the numerical modeling of healing behavior for damaged polymer-matrix composites. Healed and not healed cases are discussed in order to show the model capability and to describe the main governing characteristics concerning the evolution of healed systems.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most existing models adopt a continuum damage mechanics-based approach in which cracking and healing are interpreted as degradation or recovery of material stiffness and strength.
“Most of the existing models adopt a continuum damage mechanics-based approach whereby cracking and healing are interpreted as a degradation or recovery of material stiffness and strength ( Barbero et al., 2005; Voyiadjis et al., 2011; 2012; Mergheim and Steinmann, 2013; Darabi et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2014; Ozaki et al., 2016 ).”
From A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials (2018) · cites this paper as Barbero et al., 2005
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 187
- Authors
- Barbero, E. J., Greco, F., & Lonetti, P.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- University of Calabria (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Barbero, Ever J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Damage Mechanics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-81
- ISSN
- 1056-7895 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-7921
- OpenAlex
- W2135077846
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Locations
- International Journal of Damage Mechanics (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Numerical methods in engineering
- Keywords
- self-healing materials, constitutive modeling, thermodynamic consistency, dissipation potential, microcrack closure, void healing, polymer matrix composites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review