Cited by 187Polymer composites and self-healingMechanical Behavior of CompositesNumerical methods in engineering

Continuum damage–healing mechanics with application to self-healing composites

Open access
Barbero, Ever J., Greco, Fabrizio, Lonetti, Paolo·2005·International Journal of Damage Mechanics

Abstract

The general behavior of self-healing materials is modeled including both irreversible and healing processes. A constitutive model, based on a continuum thermodynamic framework, is proposed to predict the general response of self-healing materials. The self-healing materials’ response produces a reduction in size of microcracks and voids, opposite to damage. The constitutive model, developed in the mesoscale, is based on the proposed Continuum Damage-Healing Mechanics (CDHM) cast in a consistent thermodynamic framework that automatically satisfies the thermodynamic restrictions. The degradation and healing evolution variables are obtained introducing proper dissipation potentials, which are motivated by physically based assumptions. An efficient three-step operator slip algorithm, including healing variables, is discussed in order to accurately integrate the coupled elastoplastic-damage-healing constitutive equations. Material parameters are identified by means of simple and effective analytical procedures. Results are shown in order to demonstrate the numerical modeling of healing behavior for damaged polymer-matrix composites. Healed and not healed cases are discussed in order to show the model capability and to describe the main governing characteristics concerning the evolution of healed systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1056789505045928

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most existing models adopt a continuum damage mechanics-based approach in which cracking and healing are interpreted as degradation or recovery of material stiffness and strength.

    “Most of the existing models adopt a continuum damage mechanics-based approach whereby cracking and healing are interpreted as a degradation or recovery of material stiffness and strength ( Barbero et al., 2005; Voyiadjis et al., 2011; 2012; Mergheim and Steinmann, 2013; Darabi et al., 2012; Xu et al., 2014; Ozaki et al., 2016 ).”

    From A cohesive-zone crack healing model for self-healing materials (2018) · cites this paper as Barbero et al., 2005

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 187

Authors
Barbero, E. J., Greco, F., & Lonetti, P.
Affiliations
  • West Virginia University (US)
  • University of Calabria (IT)
Corresponding author
Barbero, Ever J.
Venue
International Journal of Damage Mechanics
Published
2005-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
51-81
ISSN
  • 1056-7895 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-7921
OpenAlex
W2135077846
Cited by
187
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Damage Mechanics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive of Doctoral Theses and Digital Collections (University of Calabria) (submittedVersion)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Numerical methods in engineering
Keywords
self-healing materials, constitutive modeling, thermodynamic consistency, dissipation potential, microcrack closure, void healing, polymer matrix composites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review