Cited by 65Policing Practices and PerceptionsCriminal Law and EvidenceDeception detection and forensic psychology

Leading an Experiment in Police Body-Worn Video Cameras

Drover, Paul, Ariel, Barak·2015·International Criminal Justice Review

Abstract

Body-worn video (BWV) is seen internationally as having the potential to reduce public complaints against police, police use of force, and attrition of prosecutions due to lack of physical evidence. Beyond the Cambridge trial in Rialto, California, however, no studies have tested the effects of BWV. The present study documents a Police leaders’ implementation of a randomized controlled trial of the use of BWV. The main objectives are to identify the challenges to implementing a trial and identify how they were overcome. The solutions to these challenges may provide key lessons for police leaders, not only as they undertake evidence-based testing, but also as they manage police operations and implement change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1057567715574374

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Drover, P., & Ariel, B.
Affiliations
  • West Midlands Police (GB)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Drover, Paul
Venue
International Criminal Justice Review
Published
2015-02-27
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
80-97
ISSN
  • 1057-5677 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3855
OpenAlex
W2075786988
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
62.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Criminal Justice Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Law and Evidence
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
police leadership, randomized controlled trials, implementation barriers, evidence-based policing, police accountability, police use of force, organizational change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review