Cited by 20Policing Practices and PerceptionsPublic Policy and Administration ResearchHealth Policy Implementation Science

Tracking Quality of Police Actions in a Victim Contact Program: A Case Study of Training, Tracking, and Feedback (TTF) in Evidence-Based Policing

Slothower, Molly, Sherman, Lawrence W., Neyroud, Peter·2015·International Criminal Justice Review

Abstract

In policing, quality of implementation—not just whether a policy is implemented, but how it is implemented—often means the difference between achieving the desired outcomes or not. Police leaders can respond to tracking evidence that shows poor quality of implementation by either improving officer compliance with policy, improving the policy itself, or both. We report a case study of the tracking of implementation quality in a randomized controlled trial of a police policy for contacting victims, in which the first author was a participant-observer. We show that when the results of tracking were fed back to officers to improve compliance, and to managers, who then redesigned policy and training in repeated iterations, the quality of implementation and victim satisfaction improved substantially. This evidence-based, training-tracking-feedback strategy of implementation can be applied more generally to improve the quality of police services and outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1057567715574975

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 20

Authors
Slothower, M., Sherman, L. W., & Neyroud, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland and Cambridge Centre for Evidence-based Policing, Cambridge, UK
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Slothower, Molly
Venue
International Criminal Justice Review
Published
2015-03
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
98-116
ISSN
  • 1057-5677 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-3855
OpenAlex
W2150939847
Cited by
20
References
68
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
23.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Criminal Justice Review (publishedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Lee Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
implementation quality, policy feedback, police training, victim satisfaction, evidence-based policing, randomized controlled trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review