Tracking Quality of Police Actions in a Victim Contact Program: A Case Study of Training, Tracking, and Feedback (TTF) in Evidence-Based Policing
Abstract
In policing, quality of implementation—not just whether a policy is implemented, but how it is implemented—often means the difference between achieving the desired outcomes or not. Police leaders can respond to tracking evidence that shows poor quality of implementation by either improving officer compliance with policy, improving the policy itself, or both. We report a case study of the tracking of implementation quality in a randomized controlled trial of a police policy for contacting victims, in which the first author was a participant-observer. We show that when the results of tracking were fed back to officers to improve compliance, and to managers, who then redesigned policy and training in repeated iterations, the quality of implementation and victim satisfaction improved substantially. This evidence-based, training-tracking-feedback strategy of implementation can be applied more generally to improve the quality of police services and outcomes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Maintaining consistent treatment integrity across several sites is a challenge in experimental criminology.
“Maintaining consistent treatment integrity across several sites is a challenge in experimental criminology (see MacKenzie et al. 2013; de Brito 2017; Slothower et al. 2015; Weisburd and Taxman 2000).”
From Paradoxical effects of self-awareness of being observed: testing the effect of police body-worn cameras on assaults and aggression against officers (2018) · cites this paper as Slothower et al. 2015
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 20
- Authors
- Slothower, M., Sherman, L. W., & Neyroud, P.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland and Cambridge Centre for Evidence-based Policing, Cambridge, UK
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Slothower, Molly
- Venue
- International Criminal Justice Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 98-116
- ISSN
- 1057-5677 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-3855
- OpenAlex
- W2150939847
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 23.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Criminal Justice Review (publishedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Lee Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- implementation quality, policy feedback, police training, victim satisfaction, evidence-based policing, randomized controlled trials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review