The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Workplace Social Exchange Network: A Multilevel, Conceptual Examination
Abstract
In this article, the authors present a framework (the Workplace Social Exchange Network) that draws from multiple streams of social exchange research. The authors attempt to provide an integrative, cross-level theory for understanding the diverse social exchanges that occur in the work-place. Within the workplace, there are a number of social exchanges that may take place between an individual and (a) the organization, (b) their supervisor, and (c) their work group. Surprisingly, researchers have overlooked the influence of social exchanges between employees and their work groups. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first article that collectively discusses the influences and interactions between the three predominate social exchange domains. In addition, the authors provide testable propositions that specify relationships between domains of exchange relationships, moderating organizational factors, and employee outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.117.3.497 · Cited by 23,245
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Perceived organizational support.
Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.500 · Cited by 10,023
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
Cited by
Social support at work: an integrative review
Jolly, P. M., Kong, D. T., & Kim, K. Y. (2021) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2485 · Cited by 513
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Tziner, A. (2014) · Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones · doi:10.5093/tr2014a1 · Cited by 129
Shah, S. H. A., Haider, A., Jindong, J., Mumtaz, A., & Rafiq, N. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.810378 · Cited by 86
Social exchange theory in leadership research: A problematizing review
Madison, K., Eva, N., De Cieri, H., & Goh, Z. (2025) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2025.101924 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, M. S., Schaninger, W. S., & Harris, S. G.
- Venue
- Group & Organization Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-167
- ISSN
- 1059-6011 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3993
- OpenAlex
- W2161280685
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Workplace Social Exchange Network: A Multilevel, Conceptual Examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1059601102027001008
- The paper
- Cole, M. S., Schaninger, W. S., & Harris, S. G. (2002). The Workplace Social Exchange Network: A Multilevel, Conceptual Examination. Group & Organization Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601102027001008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.