Evolution and dispersal under climatic instability: a simple evolutionary algorithm
Abstract
It has long been known that temporally unstable environments are likely to promote the evolution of plastic adaptations, whilst it is equally clear that such adaptations are precisely those that characterize successful colonizers. These two established findings, however, are rarely related within a single framework. This article bridges this gap via the development of a very simple evolutionary algorithm that tracks both directional selection and the evolution of plasticity under various synthetic climatic regimes. The output of the model allows for the construction of a dispersal index that provides a measure of population-level dispersal potential under each particular climatic regime. The output thus establishes both the timing and extent of selection for plasticity and the consequences of that plasticity for the timing of probable dispersal events in the context of climatic instability. Results suggest that periods of low climatic instability abruptly following extended periods of higher climatic instability are particularly conducive to dispersal, leading to the formulation of the Accumulated Plasticity Hypothesis. These results, and the hypothesis they support, are discussed in relation to the varied manifestations of plasticity in biological systems and their relevance to human evolution.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a heterogeneous environment, organisms can survive by specializing in a niche to out-compete others, paying the cost that they are out-competed in other niches.
“When in a heterogeneous environment, organisms can survive by: a) specializing in a niche to out-compete others, paying the cost that they are out-competed in other niches Nisioti and Moulin-Frier (2022); Grove (2014)”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Grove (2014)
Plasticity comes with fitness costs, so that plastic individuals are out-competed by specialists in their preferred niche.
“On the downside, plasticity comes with fitness costs, so that plastic individuals are out-competed by specialists in their preferred niche (Grove, 2014;Nisioti and Moulin-Frier, 2022)”
From Dynamics of niche construction in adaptable populations evolving in diverse environments (2023) · cites this paper as Grove, 2014
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 106 · Cited by 38
- Authors
- Grove, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Grove, Matt
- ORCID
- Grove, Matt
- Venue
- Adaptive Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-07-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 235-254
- ISSN
- 1059-7123 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2633
- OpenAlex
- W2117025414
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 106
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Adaptive Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Keywords
- phenotypic plasticity, climatic instability, dispersal, directional selection, evolutionary algorithms, human evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review