Cited by 49Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

Dietary Supplement Adverse Event Report Data From the FDA Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Adverse Event Reporting System (CAERS), 2004-2013

Timbo, Babgaleh B., Chirtel, Stuart J., Ihrie, John, Oladipo, Taiye, Velez-Suarez, Loy, Brewer, Vickery, Mozersky, Robert·2018·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Background: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN) oversees the safety of the nation’s foods, dietary supplements, and cosmetic products. Objective: To present a descriptive analysis of the 2004-2013 dietary supplement adverse event report (AER) data from CAERS and evaluate the 2006 Dietary Supplements and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act as pertaining to dietary supplements adverse events reporting. Methods: We queried CAERS for data from the 2004-2013 AERs specifying at least 1 suspected dietary supplement product. We extracted the product name(s), the symptom(s) reported, age, sex, and serious adverse event outcomes. We examined time trends for mandatory and voluntary reporting and performed analysis using SAS v9.4 and R v3.3.0 software. Results: Of the total AERs (n = 15 430) received from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2013, indicating at least 1 suspected dietary supplement product, 66.9% were mandatory, 32.2% were voluntary, and 0.9% were both mandatory and voluntary. Reported serious outcomes included death, life-threatening conditions, hospitalizations, congenital anomalies/birth defects and events requiring interventions to prevent permanent impairments (5.1%). The dietary supplement adverse event reporting rate in the United States was estimated at ~2% based on CAERS data. Conclusions: This study characterizes CAERS dietary supplement adverse event data for the 2004-2013 period and estimates a reporting rate of 2% for dietary supplement adverse events based on CAERS data. The findings show that the 2006 Dietary Supplements and Nonprescription Drug Consumer Protection Act had a substantial impact on the reporting of adverse events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1060028017744316

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timbo, B. B., Chirtel, S. J., Ihrie, J., Oladipo, T., Velez-Suarez, L., Brewer, V., & Mozersky, R.
Affiliations
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US)
Corresponding author
Timbo, Babgaleh B.
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2017-11-24
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
431-438
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W2769146407
Cited by
49
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
dietary supplements, adverse event reporting, mandatory reporting, voluntary reporting, serious adverse events, reporting rates, supplement safety, FDA regulation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review