Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Clinical Data for the Use of CAR T-cell Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To evaluate the literature for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), a first-in-class chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Data Sources: We conducted a PubMed (inception to June 22, 2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov search using the following terms: CD19, chimeric antigen receptor, and lymphoma. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the use of axi-cel in LBCL were reviewed. Data Synthesis: In the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial, axi-cel exhibited unprecedented overall and complete response rates of 83% and 58%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months, 39% of patients had ongoing responses. Furthermore, postmarketing retrospective analyses found similar response rates in a more clinically diverse LBCL patient population. Novel CAR T-cell therapy elicits unique and potentially life-threatening toxicities that include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Studies reported grade ≥3 CRS in 7% to 14% of patients and grade ≥3 ICANS in 31% to 55% of patients. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Axi-cel was the first US Food and Drug Administration–approved genetically engineered autologous CAR T-cell agent in r/r LBCL, representing an important milestone and paradigm shift in cancer treatment. Adoptive T-cell immunotherapy is a breakthrough treatment modality requiring careful patient selection, multidisciplinary collaboration, comprehensive patient counseling, and expert training to ensure optimal treatment. Conclusions: The initial and ongoing results with axi-cel are encouraging, but long-term safety and efficacy data are lacking. Additional studies are required to identify axi-cel’s ideal place in LBCL therapy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Higher degrees of expansion (Cmax) and/or longer durations of expansion (AUC) of CAR-T cells in patients are biomarkers associated with positive clinical responses.
“Higher degrees of expansion (Cmax) and/or longer durations of expansion (area under the curve, AUC) of CAR-T cells in patients have been identified as biomarkers associated with positive clinical responses [34, 35].”
From Harmonisation of quality control tests for academic production of CAR-T cells: a position paper from the WP-bioproduction of the UNITC consortium (2025) · cites this paper as [38]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 65 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Halford, Z., Anderson, M. K., & Bennett, L. L.
- Affiliations
- Union University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Halford, Zachery
- Venue
- Annals of Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-07-22
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 390-405
- ISSN
- 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
- 1060-0280
- 1542-6270
- OpenAlex
- W3045009269
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Keywords
- axicabtagene ciloleucel, CAR T-cell therapy, large B-cell lymphoma, relapsed/refractory lymphoma, complete response rate, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, CAR T-cell toxicity, adoptive T cell therapy, treatment efficacy and safety
- MeSH terms
- Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Biological Products, Humans, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Antigens, CD19
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review