Cited by 18CAR-T cell therapy researchLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Axicabtagene Ciloleucel: Clinical Data for the Use of CAR T-cell Therapy in Relapsed and Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma

Open access
Halford, Zachery, Anderson, Mary Kate, Bennett, Lunawati L.·2021·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the literature for axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), a first-in-class chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Data Sources: We conducted a PubMed (inception to June 22, 2020) and ClinicalTrials.gov search using the following terms: CD19, chimeric antigen receptor, and lymphoma. Study Selection and Data Extraction: All retrospective and prospective studies evaluating the use of axi-cel in LBCL were reviewed. Data Synthesis: In the pivotal ZUMA-1 trial, axi-cel exhibited unprecedented overall and complete response rates of 83% and 58%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 27.1 months, 39% of patients had ongoing responses. Furthermore, postmarketing retrospective analyses found similar response rates in a more clinically diverse LBCL patient population. Novel CAR T-cell therapy elicits unique and potentially life-threatening toxicities that include cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Studies reported grade ≥3 CRS in 7% to 14% of patients and grade ≥3 ICANS in 31% to 55% of patients. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: Axi-cel was the first US Food and Drug Administration–approved genetically engineered autologous CAR T-cell agent in r/r LBCL, representing an important milestone and paradigm shift in cancer treatment. Adoptive T-cell immunotherapy is a breakthrough treatment modality requiring careful patient selection, multidisciplinary collaboration, comprehensive patient counseling, and expert training to ensure optimal treatment. Conclusions: The initial and ongoing results with axi-cel are encouraging, but long-term safety and efficacy data are lacking. Additional studies are required to identify axi-cel’s ideal place in LBCL therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1060028020944233

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 18

Authors
Halford, Z., Anderson, M. K., & Bennett, L. L.
Affiliations
Union University (US)
Corresponding author
Halford, Zachery
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2020-07-22
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
390-405
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W3045009269
Cited by
18
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
axicabtagene ciloleucel, CAR T-cell therapy, large B-cell lymphoma, relapsed/refractory lymphoma, complete response rate, cytokine release syndrome, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, CAR T-cell toxicity, adoptive T cell therapy, treatment efficacy and safety
MeSH terms
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen, Biological Products, Humans, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Immunotherapy, Adoptive, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse, Antigens, CD19

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review